1992
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.1992.sp003642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The protective effect of damaging eccentric exercise against repeated bouts of exercise in the mouse tibialis anterior muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,5). Changes in these markers of muscle injury are reduced after a second bout of lengthening contractions, indicating an adaptation that protects skeletal muscle from subsequent injury (3,10,21,25,26,32). Although several mechanisms have been proposed, including increased sarcomere number (13) and a greater homogeneity in sarcomere strength during contraction (4), the adaptations responsible for protection from muscle injury are not well understood (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,5). Changes in these markers of muscle injury are reduced after a second bout of lengthening contractions, indicating an adaptation that protects skeletal muscle from subsequent injury (3,10,21,25,26,32). Although several mechanisms have been proposed, including increased sarcomere number (13) and a greater homogeneity in sarcomere strength during contraction (4), the adaptations responsible for protection from muscle injury are not well understood (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mice, lengthening exercises elicited by peroneal nerve stimulation provided protection against a second bout of damage elicited 21 days later, but not 84 days later (Sacco and Jones 1992). Following EMS-evoked lengthening contractions of the human forearm flexors performed at two time points separated by 2 weeks, all markers of muscle injury (serum creatine kinase, muscle soreness, range of motion, plasma myoglobin, and maximal isometric force) had a significantly lower response, if any, following the second bout (Nosaka et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The process requires many days but the muscles return to normal function and are often more resistant to injury (i.e. a training effect) [81,100]. Mechanisms of muscle regeneration following injury have been reviewed in detail [16].…”
Section: Muscle Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%