2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1374-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The protective effect of persistent trigeminal artery in patients with ischemic stroke

Abstract: Background Almost all case reports related to persistent trigeminal artery indicated that the existence of persistent trigeminal artery may increase the risk of ischemic stroke. However our case demonstrated that the persistent trigeminal artery may also play a protective role in preventing severe ischemic stroke by functioning as collateral circulation. Case presentation We reported a patient with left internal carotid artery occlusion with persistent trigeminal artery… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 While most cases of PTA with concurrent cerebrovascular disease depict a heightened risk of posterior circulation stroke, 2 a role for the PTA during proximal large vessel occlusion as a protective collateral distally has been described. 3 Our case highlights an uncommon cause of posterior circulation infarction with simultaneous anterior circulation hypoperfusion. Our patient's initial presentation was in keeping with a suspected partial right MCA infarction due to gaze deviation and neglect, but imaging with noncontrast CT and MRI revealed a large isolated right PCA territory infarction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…2 While most cases of PTA with concurrent cerebrovascular disease depict a heightened risk of posterior circulation stroke, 2 a role for the PTA during proximal large vessel occlusion as a protective collateral distally has been described. 3 Our case highlights an uncommon cause of posterior circulation infarction with simultaneous anterior circulation hypoperfusion. Our patient's initial presentation was in keeping with a suspected partial right MCA infarction due to gaze deviation and neglect, but imaging with noncontrast CT and MRI revealed a large isolated right PCA territory infarction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%