2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00573.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The proteolysis-inducing factor: in search of its clinical relevance in patients with metastatic gastric/esophageal cancer

Abstract: The proteolysis-inducing factor is a putative mediator of cancer-associated weight loss. The goal of this study was to examine for the first time: (i) its prevalence in patients with metastatic gastric/esophageal cancer; and (ii) whether it possibly correlated with weight loss and anorexia and whether it predicted tumor response and patient survival. This study recruited 41 patients as part of a phase II therapeutic, chemotherapy protocol for patients with metastatic gastric/esophageal cancer. Patient eligibil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A phase III study reported 47.9% objective response for patients treated with EOX; this difference in outcomes may be explained by the difference in number of patients treated in each study (16 and 244, respectively) (Cunningham et al, 2008). Some phase II studies that evaluated the efficacy of treatment with two drugs reported an overall RR of 42% on average (range: 35% to 65%) that is consistent with the value obtained in this study (Jatoi et al, 2006;Park et al, 2006;Van Meerten et al, 2007). This study was not designed to compare various treatment protocols, so these findings must be analyzed carefully.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A phase III study reported 47.9% objective response for patients treated with EOX; this difference in outcomes may be explained by the difference in number of patients treated in each study (16 and 244, respectively) (Cunningham et al, 2008). Some phase II studies that evaluated the efficacy of treatment with two drugs reported an overall RR of 42% on average (range: 35% to 65%) that is consistent with the value obtained in this study (Jatoi et al, 2006;Park et al, 2006;Van Meerten et al, 2007). This study was not designed to compare various treatment protocols, so these findings must be analyzed carefully.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Additionally, mRNA encoding the PIF core peptide was reported recently in nonmalignant tissue (12). The Western blot signal using PIF mAb had no relationship with survival in our or other studies (10,11). This is an important discrepancy because weight loss predicts survival, especially in cancers of the lung (26 -28) and esophagus (29).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The gastric/esophageal patients did not show a relationship between PIF status and weight loss (11). Weight data are not available on all the lung patients, but for 116 of them, there are a total of 970 individual weight records extractable from patient charts or on average 8.3 weight records per patient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations