1980
DOI: 10.1021/j100459a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The proton affinity of ammonia. A theoretical determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the former experimental energy as a benchmark produces the correction of roughly 5 kcal/mol to be applied to the theoretical BDEs. This correction works well for the C−Cl BDE of chlorobenzene, for which it yields the value of 93.2 kcal/mol, in good agreement with the experimental estimates (obtained from the respective Δ H 298 data by subtracting (5/2) RT ≈ 1.5 kcal/mol to account for thermal effects) of 93.6, 93.0, and 94.2 ± 2 kcal/mol 3 Dependence of the Calculated C−H and C−Cl Bond Dissociation Energies on the Parent Molecule and the Abstraction Site C−X BDE (kcal/mol) for the siteparent molecule123456 C 6 H 6 106.94106.94106.94106.94106.94106.94 C 6 H 5 Cl88.18108.45107.10107.98107.10108.45 1,2-C 6 H 4 Cl 2 86.0686.06107.96107.96107.96107.96 1,3-C 6 H 4 Cl 2 87.30109.9587.30109.37107.21109.37 1,4-C 6 H 4 Cl 2 88.24108.60108.6088.24108.60108.60 1,2,3-C 6 H 3 Cl 3 84.7584.1684.75108.57107.96108.57 1,2,4-C 6 H 3 Cl 3 86.3385.50109.4387.51109.37108.08 1,3,5-C 6 H 3 Cl 3 86.50110.7486.50110.7486.50110.74 1,2,3,4-C 6 H 2 Cl 4 84.8882.9882.9884.88108.65108.65 1,2,3,5-C 6 H 2 Cl 4 84.1784.5084.17109.9386.81109.93 1,2,4,5-C 6 H 2 Cl 4 85.8385.83108.9585.8385.83108.95 C 6 HCl 5 84.3683.1081.7683.1084.36109.26 C 6 Cl 6 81.5881.5881.5881.5881.5881.58 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Taking the former experimental energy as a benchmark produces the correction of roughly 5 kcal/mol to be applied to the theoretical BDEs. This correction works well for the C−Cl BDE of chlorobenzene, for which it yields the value of 93.2 kcal/mol, in good agreement with the experimental estimates (obtained from the respective Δ H 298 data by subtracting (5/2) RT ≈ 1.5 kcal/mol to account for thermal effects) of 93.6, 93.0, and 94.2 ± 2 kcal/mol 3 Dependence of the Calculated C−H and C−Cl Bond Dissociation Energies on the Parent Molecule and the Abstraction Site C−X BDE (kcal/mol) for the siteparent molecule123456 C 6 H 6 106.94106.94106.94106.94106.94106.94 C 6 H 5 Cl88.18108.45107.10107.98107.10108.45 1,2-C 6 H 4 Cl 2 86.0686.06107.96107.96107.96107.96 1,3-C 6 H 4 Cl 2 87.30109.9587.30109.37107.21109.37 1,4-C 6 H 4 Cl 2 88.24108.60108.6088.24108.60108.60 1,2,3-C 6 H 3 Cl 3 84.7584.1684.75108.57107.96108.57 1,2,4-C 6 H 3 Cl 3 86.3385.50109.4387.51109.37108.08 1,3,5-C 6 H 3 Cl 3 86.50110.7486.50110.7486.50110.74 1,2,3,4-C 6 H 2 Cl 4 84.8882.9882.9884.88108.65108.65 1,2,3,5-C 6 H 2 Cl 4 84.1784.5084.17109.9386.81109.93 1,2,4,5-C 6 H 2 Cl 4 85.8385.83108.9585.8385.83108.95 C 6 HCl 5 84.3683.1081.7683.1084.36109.26 C 6 Cl 6 81.5881.5881.5881.5881.5881.58 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, proton affinity rather than the p K a value has been adopted as an indicator of relative basicity. 96 Proton affinity of 2-CPh and ammonia corresponds to 1410 97 and 857 kJ mol –1 , 98 respectively, at 25 °C. According to the Brønsted–Lowry theory, a base is a proton acceptor, and the higher the proton affinity, the stronger the base is.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OH2 by Kebarle,64 and a value of -19.9 kcal/mol, which was adjusted to -20. 6 kcal/mol by M e~t -N e r .~~ The computed enthalpy is -18.9 kcal/mol. Table I.…”
Section: Neutral Complexesmentioning
confidence: 95%