2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The proton radius: from a puzzle to precision

Abstract: We comment on the status and history of the proton charge radius determinations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The indicated range for the HBChPT result corresponds with the range given by Eq. (15) in Ref. [17].…”
Section: Doubly Virtual Compton Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The indicated range for the HBChPT result corresponds with the range given by Eq. (15) in Ref. [17].…”
Section: Doubly Virtual Compton Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the next generation of high-precision experiments both in scattering and spectroscopy, the focus is now shifting to improve the precision on this fundamental nucleon structure quantity, as spelled out recently in Ref. [15]. Indeed, to extract the proton charge radius from μH Lamb shift measurements, which is at present the most precise method, the proton form factors, structure functions, and polarizabilities are all required as input in a quantitative understanding of the hadronic correction [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not include external constraints on r p M or r n M . We have not included dispersive constraints [11,12,87,88] on the form factors such as from ππ → NN data, since these constraints have either modest impact on the fits [14] or introduce further theoretical considerations. Our form factor results are presented with complete error budgets that may be compared to other determinations using dispersive analysis, lattice QCD, or future electron scattering data.…”
Section: B Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…not incorporate the low-Q 2 constraint on the proton electric form factor that emerges from muonic atom spectroscopy. While there is not a complete consensus regarding the resolution of the so-called proton radius puzzle [8][9][10][11][12], we believe it is important to be able to consistently incorporate these data and study their impact for applications such as neutrino scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation