2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10016-004-0008-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Proximal Landing Zone in Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of hemodynamic considerations for some authors and anatomic ones for others, the position of endograft deployment has been advocated as an important criterion to consider in correlation with neck length. 24,25 Indeed, a relationship between the endograft landing position and the drag forces acting on the endograft has been proved by Cheng et al 26 The force is greatest at the top of the arch and decreases significantly in the descending aorta. These findings have led some authors to modify their criteria of proximal aortic neck length in case of zone 1 endografting to 30 mm or more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of hemodynamic considerations for some authors and anatomic ones for others, the position of endograft deployment has been advocated as an important criterion to consider in correlation with neck length. 24,25 Indeed, a relationship between the endograft landing position and the drag forces acting on the endograft has been proved by Cheng et al 26 The force is greatest at the top of the arch and decreases significantly in the descending aorta. These findings have led some authors to modify their criteria of proximal aortic neck length in case of zone 1 endografting to 30 mm or more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These findings have led some authors to modify their criteria of proximal aortic neck length in case of zone 1 endografting to 30 mm or more. 24,25 Furthermore, numerous studies 5,6,8,21 report landing zone 2 as anatomically unsuitable for stent graft implantation because it can favor endoleak. These authors argue, first, that LSA overstenting exposes the stent graft to abrupt angulation with, in consequence, excessive mechanical stress acting on the stent and incomplete apposition of the devices, thus incurring a risk of type I endoleak.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2,6,9,14,18,20,21,29,34 No endoleaks occurred in two studies of TAAs 6,18 and two studies of TADs. 2,31 The mean rate of endoleaks was highly similar for TAAs at 10.3% (range, 4%-30%) and TADs at 11.1% (range, 7%-47%). With a total of 32 procedures, the total rate of endoleaks for TAD was 6.25%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The type of endoleak was specified in eight of 18 studies. 9,15,18,23,[26][27][28]31 In patients with an endoleak (13.4% of 371 patients), 76% of the endoleaks were type 1 leaks (remaining endoleaks at the end of the procedure), 20% were type 2, and 4% were type 3. No early type 4 endoleaks were observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both technical and long-term success depend on anatomical conditions for optimal fixation of the SG. For this reason, complete coverage of the LSA ostium has to be used at times to expand the application of endovascular devices to aortic pathologies adjacent to the LSA [5,8,15,16]. Approximately 30% of our patients required complete coverage of the LSA, which did not cause severe problems during a mean 19-month follow-up period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%