The psychological aspects of paraconsistency

Rudnicki, K.

doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02983-8

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…"The reflection that apparent contradictions are everywhere around us and that treating them as anomalies may not be the best way to go" (64). We easily collect contradictory data, accumulate inconsistent information, and find the increasing information also increases the variance (7,65,66).…”

Section: Paraconsistent and Paracomplete Logic Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operational Logics and Inference During [1/f or f -1] Noise Events: High-Reliability Operations (HRO)

2022

Neonatology Today

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To prepare for and operate in stochastic environments, we study and even master academic models. The environmental stochastic Noise separates the world of practice from scientific theory. Oscillating and fluctuating processes create frequencies of power, the color of Noise, and unpredictability. These environments also contain the determinants of stress, putting individuals at risk of the peculiar Logic of Stress and the ecology of fear. We effectively engage these environments by logic, a logic of practice shared by those who crossed the threshold with us -not classical logic, however. Modal logics conform to changing events and support flexible thinking. Paraconsistent logics support inferences from contradictions. In topology, the central concept is continuity and how the elements preserve a notion of nearness by a continuous function. They maintain connectedness during deformation without tearing apart to create a new boundary.

show abstract

Section: Paraconsistent and Paracomplete Logic Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operational Logics and Inference During [1/f or f -1] Noise Events: High-Reliability Operations (HRO)

2022

Neonatology Today

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Exploring the Definition of Non-Monotonicity – Logical and Psychological Considerations

Łukowski,

Rudnicki

2024

B Sect Log

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When humans reason, they are able to revise their beliefs in light of new information and abandon obsolete conclusions. Logicians argued, that in some cases, such reasonings appear to be non-monotonic. Thus, many different, seemingly non-monotonic systems were created to formally model such cases. The purpose of this article is to re-examine the definition of non-monotonicity and its implementation in non-monotonic logics and in examples of everyday human reasoning. We will argue that many non-monotonic logics employ some weakened versions of the definitions of non-monotonicity, since in-between different steps of reasoning they either: a) allow previously accepted premises to be removed, or b) change the rules of inference. Of the two strategies, the second one seems downright absurd, since changing the rules of a given logic is a mere replacement of that logic with the rules of another. As a consequence we obtain two logics, whereas the definition of a non-monotonic logic is supposed to define one. The definition of non-monotonicity does not permit either of these cases, which means that such logics are monotonic.

show abstract

The psychological aspects of paraconsistency

Cited by 2 publications

References 38 publications

Operational Logics and Inference During [1/f or f -1] Noise Events: High-Reliability Operations (HRO)

Operational Logics and Inference During [1/f or f -1] Noise Events: High-Reliability Operations (HRO)

Exploring the Definition of Non-Monotonicity – Logical and Psychological Considerations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About