The Psychological Distance and Climate Change: A Systematic Review on the Mitigation and Adaptation Behaviors

Abstract

Background and Objective: Currently, climate change represents an existential, physical, and psychological threat. Therefore, mitigation and adaptation actions and measures have become increasingly necessary to preserve individual and collective well-being. The psychological distance is one of the main psychological constructs that explains the most concrete or abstract perception of the objects and events surrounding people. The psychological distance is a multidimensional construct, and in accordance with the construal level theory (CLT), temporal, hypothetical, spatial, and social distance are considered the most critical dimensions. This systematic review aims to provide an update of the literature on the role of psychological distance in the commitment to engagement mitigation and adaptation attitudes toward climate change. Method: The review was carried out following PRISMA guidelines and a systematic search was performed on PubMed, Psycinfo, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Results: Nineteen articles have been identified as being eligible for the final synthesis. Results showed, in general, that individuals have a higher propensity to perform pro-environmental and resilient behaviors against climate change when it is perceived as more proximal and concrete within the construct of psychological distance. However, not all studies show this result. Some studies showed that, despite people considering climate changes as real and tangible, they do not perform mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Other studies showed that people implement these behaviors despite perceiving climate changes as distal and abstract. Conclusions: The current literature shows the existence of a relation among psychological distance and pro-environmental and resilient behaviors applied to climate change. For a deeper understanding of the conflicting results that emerged, more studies are necessary to explore the possible presence of further psychological variables involved in the relation within psychological distance, mitigation, and adaptation in environmental contexts.

Updating the Chieti Affective Action Videos database with older adults

“…Emotional action videos of the CAAV could be also used for the development of both mood induction methodologies and emotional regulation training programs 52,53 . The availability of a well-matched and highly controlled database of video stimuli that explicitly manipulates different perspectives (third/first person POV) opens new avenues for ecological studies [54][55][56] . For instance, it would be interesting to use the CAAV stimuli through augmented reality instruments (e.g., with Virtual Reality tool).…”

Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Examine Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Moderating Effect of COVID-19 Beliefs

“…However, awareness and understanding alone cannot make it successful unless behavioral mechanisms steer individuals to accept their responsibility towards the environmental [9]. The fact remains that, since individuals perceive a psychological distance [10][11][12] between climate change and their own personal surroundings, this issue will continue to be considered of secondary importance in comparison to other priorities in people's daily lives [7]. This aspect becomes even more evident when pro-environmental behavior is hindered by catastrophic events, when emergency situations may lead people to review their perceptions of priorities.…”

Perceptions of Climate Change in China: Evidence From Surveys of Residents in Six Cities

“…The media environment is another potential driver of the formation of climate change opinion. The Construal Level Theory suggests that psychological distant concepts like climate change are usually represented by high‐level and abstract concepts and heavily determined by media exposure (Liu et al., 2021; Maiella et al., 2020). The Chinese media coverage of climate change focuses on environmental and human impacts but is hesitant to include any conflicting views (Han et al., 2017), as it happens daily in Western countries (Gustafson et al., 2019).…”