2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01811-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychological Science Accelerator’s COVID-19 rapid-response dataset

Abstract: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing, cognitive reappraisals, and autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental study, a general questionnaire examining health prevention behaviors and COVID-19 experience, geographical and cultural context characterizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the movement appears to have been driven by early career researchers (i.e., those who are within five years of their first appointment) 12 ; however, there are no large meta-scientific investigations on this specific topic to date. Potentially, the lack of investigation is tied to the newness of the large-scale research in many fields, as it is only in recent years that publications like the Open Science Collaboration 13 , Many Labs Collaborations [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] or the first papers from the Psychological Science Accelerator [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] . Generally, the researcher incentive for replication was low for three reasons.…”
Section: Who Does Big Team Science?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the movement appears to have been driven by early career researchers (i.e., those who are within five years of their first appointment) 12 ; however, there are no large meta-scientific investigations on this specific topic to date. Potentially, the lack of investigation is tied to the newness of the large-scale research in many fields, as it is only in recent years that publications like the Open Science Collaboration 13 , Many Labs Collaborations [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] or the first papers from the Psychological Science Accelerator [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] . Generally, the researcher incentive for replication was low for three reasons.…”
Section: Who Does Big Team Science?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his own work, he shares data, analysis scripts, materials, and preprints [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] .…”
Section: Section 4 -Open Science Track Record Of the Applicantmentioning
confidence: 99%