2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1118-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background/aim Psychological violence is estimated to be the most common form of intimate partner violence (IPV). Despite this, research on the independent effect of psychological violence on mental health is scarce. Moreover, the lack of a clear and consistent definition of psychological violence has made results difficult to compare. The present study therefore aims to consolidate knowledge on psychological violence by conducting a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis on the associ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that emotional abuse was the first distinctive feature among subgroups, followed by sexual coercion. This finding is consistent with past research indicating that emotional abuse and sexual coercion have differential implications on subtyping of IPV 8,37 . As previously reported in the literature, the distinctive feature among the most severe cases was injury 9 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We found that emotional abuse was the first distinctive feature among subgroups, followed by sexual coercion. This finding is consistent with past research indicating that emotional abuse and sexual coercion have differential implications on subtyping of IPV 8,37 . As previously reported in the literature, the distinctive feature among the most severe cases was injury 9 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The package metafor (Viechtbauer, 2010) produced for the R environment (version 3.2.2; R Core Team, 2015) was used to conduct the meta-analysis including the results of Vogl et al (2019, Study 3) and both studies of this research. For each path of Models 1 and 2, we ran separate random-effects models to calculate the mean weighted effects based on the findings from the three studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…165 (18) 219 (26) 100 (24) 78 1225 (17) 587 ( 263 (26) 175 (21) 47 (11) 87 1313 (9) 585 (19) Categorical outcomes eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73m 2 , n (%) 120 (12) 69 (8) 76 1822 36 4293 (9) eGFR ≤ 30 ml/min/1.73m 2 , n (%)…”
Section: Cross-sectional Associations Between Metabolites and Egfrmentioning
confidence: 99%