The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017

Abstract

We review empirical research on (social) psychology of morality to identify which issues and relations are well documented by existing data and which areas of inquiry are in need of further empirical evidence. An electronic literature search yielded a total of 1,278 relevant research articles published from 1940 through 2017. These were subjected to expert content analysis and standardized bibliometric analysis to classify research questions and relate these to (trends in) empirical approaches that characterize research on morality. We categorize the research questions addressed in this literature into five different themes and consider how empirical approaches within each of these themes have addressed psychological antecedents and implications of moral behavior. We conclude that some key features of theoretical questions relating to human morality are not systematically captured in empirical research and are in need of further investigation.

Using Machine Learning to Generate Novel Hypotheses: Increasing Optimism About COVID-19 Makes People Less Willing to Justify Unethical Behaviors

“…are not depleted, and so on (for reviews, see Ellemers, van der Toorn, Paunov, & van Leeuwen, 2019;Gerlach, Teodorescu, & Hertwig, 2019). However, these interventions to reduce unethical behaviors cannot be easily implemented in the field.…”

Influencing Change: When “Best Practice” Changes and the Prototypical Good Farmer Turns Bad

“…Such normative structures and beliefs are difficult to overcome because they are cemented by trusted information passed from a trusted and respected individual in one generation to the next. In addition, foot trimming has become a practice that has "moral" normative influence, which also explains some of the resistance some farmers reported to stopping foot trimming (33).…”

Being Honest and Acting Consistently: Boundary Conditions of the Negativity Effect in the Attribution of Morality

“…Studies on morality in trait attribution, social perception, and judgment have burgeoned in the last decade (e.g., Brambilla & Leach, 2014;Ellemers, van der Toorn, Paunov, & van Leeuwen, 2019;Goodwin, 2015;Leach, Ellemers, & Barreto, 2007;Mende-Siedlecki, Baron, & Todorov, 2013;Trafimow, Bromgard, Finlay, & Ketelaar, 2005). Research in this field has shown that characteristics related to morality such as honesty and trustworthiness, which refer to human benevolence and correctness in social interactions, have a primary role in shaping the perceptions of ourselves and others (Brambilla & Leach, 2014;Brambilla, Rusconi, Sacci, & Cherubini, 2011;Goodwin, Piazza, & Rozin, 2014;Landy, Piazza, & Goodwin, 2016Leach et al, 2007).…”