The Psychology of State Repression: Fear and Dissent Decisions in Zimbabwe

Abstract

Many authoritarian regimes use frightening acts of repression to suppress dissent. Theory from psychology suggests that emotions should affect how citizens perceive and process information about repression risk and ultimately whether or not they dissent. I test the effects of emotions on dissent in autocracy by running a lab-in-the-field experiment with 671 opposition supporters in Zimbabwe that randomly assigns some participants to an exercise that induces a mild state of fear, whereas others complete a neutral placebo. The fear treatment significantly reduces hypothetical and behavioral measures of dissent by substantively large amounts. It also increases pessimism about parameters that enter into the dissent decision as well as risk aversion. These results show that emotions interact in important ways with strategic considerations. Fear may be a powerful component of how unpopular autocrats exclude large portions of their populations from mobilizing for regime change.

Mass Repression and Political Loyalty: Evidence from Stalin’s ‘Terror by Hunger’

“…Nothing close to such consensus exists on the impact of indiscriminate mass repression. 2 Using equally plausible theories and empirical designs, past research has argued two seemingly conflicting points: indiscriminate repression induces obedience toward the perpetrator (Lyall, 2009;García-Ponce and Pasquale, 2015;Zhukov and Talibova, 2018;Young, 2018), or repression inflames adversarial sentiments and mobilizes opposition (Kocher, Pepinsky and Kalyvas, 2011;Balcells, 2012;Finkel, 2015;Lupu and Peisakhin, 2017;Rozenas, Schutte and Zhukov, 2017).…”

Affect and Autocracy: Emotions and Attitudes in Russia after Crimea

“…However, recent research on authoritarianism has started to move away from a purely materialist account. In path-breaking work in Zimbabwe, Young (2019) demonstrates the importance of fear and anger in either inhibiting or encouraging political activity on the part of opposition supporters. Fear is also the primary emotion underlying the substantial literature on preference falsification (Kuran 1997).…”

From Tyrannicide to Revolution: Aristotle on the Politics of Comradeship

“…The tyrant aims rather to transform those preferences entirely. 6 By influencing the "strategic considerations" of his subjects (Young 2019), the tyrant seeks to vitiate the substantive ends motivating dissent-namely, their beliefs in and desires for a just share. 7 Aristotle's attention to the disempowering effects of small-souledness shines a light on the terrain of struggle between tyrant and tyrannized.…”