The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire

Cuesta‐Vargas, Antonio; Bennett, Paul; Jiménez-Cebrián, Ana María; Manzanares, María Teresa Labajos

doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0287-3

Cited by 51 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, the FHSQ was used to assess and compare the QoL related to foot health and health regarding general impact . This self‐administered questionnaire on health‐related QoL is intended specifically for the foot and is recognised as a validated test, as previously described in detail …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This section has shown a high degree of content, criterion, and construct validity (the Cronbach α varies from 0.89 to 0.95) and high retest reliability (the intra‐class correlation coefficient ranges from 0.74 to 0.92) …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…12 This self-administered questionnaire on healthrelated QoL is intended specifically for the foot and is recognised as a validated test, as previously described in detail . 13,14 This self-administered tool is comprised of three sections. 15,16 Section 1 includes 13 questions about four foot health-related subcategories: foot function, foot pain, footwear, and general foot health.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Specific foot health‐related quality‐of‐life impairment in patients with type II versus type I diabetes

Palomo‐López

Losa‐Iglesias

Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo

et al. 2018

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aims of this research were to evaluate and compare the effect in a matched sample of patients with type II and type I diabetes scores using a specific quality-of-life (QoL) tool related to overall and foot health (Foot Health Status Questionnaire [FHSQ]). A sample of 62 patients with an age median of 59.00 ± 19.00 y were divided into type I (n = 31) and type II (n = 31) diabetes groups. Socio-demographics data include: (1) age, (2) gender, (3) body mass index, (4) professional activity, (5) study level, and (6) civil status. The FHSQ was used to evaluate foot (pain, function, footwear, and general health section I domains) and overall (general health, social capacity, physical activity, and vigour section II domains) health related to QoL. Differences between groups were assessed by means of a t test or Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples. There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) for any socio-demographic data. Regarding the FHSQ section II of the specific foot health-related QoL, the only statistically significant differences (P = 0.042) were observed for the general foot health showing a QoL impairment (lower median ± interquartile range) in patients diagnosed with type II diabetes (60.00 ± 60.00 points) compared with patients who suffered from type I diabetes (25.00 ± 72.50 points). The other domains did not show any statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). Patients with type II diabetes present a negative impact on the specific foot health-related QoL compared with patients who suffered from type I diabetes.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Specific foot health‐related quality‐of‐life impairment in patients with type II versus type I diabetes

Palomo‐López

Losa‐Iglesias

Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo

et al. 2018

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The standard deviation on that scale for people is approximately 29 [11][12][13] ; thus, for a bilateral hypothesis, an alpha risk of 5% and a statistical power of 80%, at least 47 cases must be studied in each group (n ¼ 94). Controls were matched to cases according to age and gender attributes.…”

Section: Sample Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

Impact on quality of life related to foot health in a sample of menopausal women: a case–control observational study

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Having established a minimal difference score of at least 21 (as clinically relevant) among the groups under study in the FHSQ, and considering that the standard deviation on that scale for the people is around 29 [13,14], for a bilateral hypothesis, an alpha risk of 5% and a statistical power of 80%, at least 47 cases must be studied in each group (n ¼ 94).…”

Section: Sample Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of life impact related to foot health in a sample of sea workers

López‐López

López

Prego

et al. 2015

Journal of Tissue Viability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire

Abstract: The clinimetric properties of the Spanish version of FHSQ were satisfactory.

Cited by 51 publications

References 12 publications

Specific foot health‐related quality‐of‐life impairment in patients with type II versus type I diabetes

Specific foot health‐related quality‐of‐life impairment in patients with type II versus type I diabetes

Impact on quality of life related to foot health in a sample of menopausal women: a case–control observational study

Quality of life impact related to foot health in a sample of sea workers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About