2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychometric testing of the functional, communicative, and critical health literacy tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comprehension of the information provided by the doctor, including the terms related to the illness of the patient, does not lead to the companions recognizing that they collaborate with doctors. These results are consistent with the patient studies that have reported that interventions aimed at improving functional literacy were less efficient than those which developed interactive health literacy (Zegers et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The comprehension of the information provided by the doctor, including the terms related to the illness of the patient, does not lead to the companions recognizing that they collaborate with doctors. These results are consistent with the patient studies that have reported that interventions aimed at improving functional literacy were less efficient than those which developed interactive health literacy (Zegers et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Functional literacy is closely linked to reading comprehension and numeracy skills [ 23 ]. Although reading comprehension competence is similar between the sexes [ 24 ], studies have found that females have poorer numeracy skills than males [ 25 ], including those with higher education [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural validity was tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) 39. We assumed a one-factor model with five items for the Swedish FHL scale and a two-factor model for the Swedish C & C HL scale 44. Before running the CFA, the presence of outliers was investigated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 We assumed a one-factor model with five items for the Swedish FHL scale and a two-factor model for the Swedish C & C HL scale. 44 Before running the CFA, the presence of outliers was investigated. Based on the squared Mahalanobis distance, there were 28 outliers and 29 outliers detected in the questionnaires of Swedish FHL and Swedish C & C HL, respectively.…”
Section: Psychometric Testing and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%