1960
DOI: 10.2307/1420172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychophysics of Form: Reversible-Perspective Drawings of Spatial Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
95
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenological observation has been a subject of a number of psychophysical experiments. These experiments showed that shape perception involves solving an optimization problem with the objective function containing measures of simplicity or compactness of the 3-D interpretation (Attneave & Frost, 1969;Hochberg & Brooks, 1960;Perkins, 1972;Pizlo & Scheessele, 1998). These simplicity and compactness constraints allowed a unique perceptual interpretation to be obtained from a single image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenological observation has been a subject of a number of psychophysical experiments. These experiments showed that shape perception involves solving an optimization problem with the objective function containing measures of simplicity or compactness of the 3-D interpretation (Attneave & Frost, 1969;Hochberg & Brooks, 1960;Perkins, 1972;Pizlo & Scheessele, 1998). These simplicity and compactness constraints allowed a unique perceptual interpretation to be obtained from a single image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the interpretation of visual form also indicate that the construction of 3-D space might be demanding. The 3-D interpretation of drawings can be effortful, and its ease is affected by cues such as shading (Hemenway and Palmer, 1978), and the number of line segments or angles in the 2-D rendition of the space (Attneave and Frost, 1969;Hochberg and Brooks, 1960). Such studies suggest that the perceptual interpretation of 3-D space requires more computation and maintenance than 2-D interpretations (Rock, 1983;Roth and Kosslyn, 1988).…”
Section: Academic Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the four projections of a cube in Figure 1. Hochberg and Brooks (1960) devised 17 different measures of simplicity to be applied to such drawings. The relative simplicity of the bidimensional shapes to one another and the relation of the measured simplicity of these shapes to that of the tridimensional cube vary depending upon the measure adopted.…”
Section: Choice Of Simplicity Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Hochberg and Brooks (1960) conveniently make our point for us by supplying alternative metrics, the point can be made with regard to any metric of simplicity. Thus, in the recent application of coding theory by Buffart et al (1981) in assessing the simplicity of figural completions, it is clear that metrics other than those used by the authors could be proposed.…”
Section: Choice Of Simplicity Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%