2012
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.1090
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychosocial impacts of implantation on the dental aesthetics of missing anterior teeth patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As, to the best of our knowledge to date, a validated, implant‐specific, patient‐reported outcome measure focused on esthetic evaluation is not available, other patient‐reported outcome measures developed in different specialties in dentistry could be adapted and validated . For example, the Oral Health Impact Profile‐Esthetic , the Orofacial Esthetic Scale and the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Esthetics questionnaire are tools developed for other dental branches and are focused on the patient's perception of their esthetic outcome. These instruments could be used as a framework to develop an implant condition‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure for the assessment of esthetic satisfaction .…”
Section: Subjective Assessment Of Esthetics: Patient‐reported Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As, to the best of our knowledge to date, a validated, implant‐specific, patient‐reported outcome measure focused on esthetic evaluation is not available, other patient‐reported outcome measures developed in different specialties in dentistry could be adapted and validated . For example, the Oral Health Impact Profile‐Esthetic , the Orofacial Esthetic Scale and the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Esthetics questionnaire are tools developed for other dental branches and are focused on the patient's perception of their esthetic outcome. These instruments could be used as a framework to develop an implant condition‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure for the assessment of esthetic satisfaction .…”
Section: Subjective Assessment Of Esthetics: Patient‐reported Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Bone resorption, negative effect of losing tooth, has a strong impact on esthetic appearance, especially in the anterior region. 4,5 To reduce bone resorption, first reported in 1976, implantation was performed immediately after extraction. 6 Through clinical study, Ataullah et al 7 confirmed that immediate implant placement, delayed implant placement, and implant placement in healed sites would achieve comparable outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the patient has high satisfaction with esthetics, the PIDAQ score for dental self-confidence will be high, and the scores for the other subscales will be low. Few studies concerning the outcome of esthetic dental treatments using the PIDAQ have been reported [38]. However, the PIDAQ has recently been translated into other languages [39][40][41][42], so it may become effective for evaluating the esthetic outcome not only of orthodontic treatment but also of prosthodontic treatment.…”
Section: Subjective Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%