2002
DOI: 10.1093/clipsy.9.3.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services.

Abstract: To date, few studies have been published on the dose‐response relationship, but there is general consensus that between 13 and 18 sessions of therapy are required for 50% of patients to improve. Reviewing the clinical trials literature reveals that in carefully controlled and implemented treatments, between 57.6% and 67.2% of patients improve within an average of 12.7 sessions. Using naturalistic data, however, revealed that the average number of sessions received in a national database of over 6,000 patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
338
1
15

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 538 publications
(379 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
25
338
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous research showing most participants in clinical trials improved after 12 sessions (Hansen et al, 2002). It may be that fewer than 10 sessions is not sufficient for reduction of symptoms with individuals who have been exposed to such extreme events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with previous research showing most participants in clinical trials improved after 12 sessions (Hansen et al, 2002). It may be that fewer than 10 sessions is not sufficient for reduction of symptoms with individuals who have been exposed to such extreme events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First, it may be the case that the present sample of trainee clinicians, on average, possesses relatively high EL A second, perhaps more likely, explanation is that the clinicians who were less confident in their abilities (including El) and/or their clients' outcomes chose not to participate in the study (though none indicated this when declining participation). The general trends of these findings, however, appear to be consistent with the broader literature reviews (e.g., Hansen, Lambert, & Forman, 2002;Shimokawa, Lambert, & Smart, 2010), in that the greatest percentages of clients experienced no change.…”
Section: Current Participants Compared With the Estahlished Literaturesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, offering stepped care to patients with low social functioning might to a certain extent adjust for differences in treatment outcome compared to patients with high social functioning. This may reflect a treatment doseeresponse effect, as the content of the guided self-help program and the FtF-CBT had a considerable overlap, adding up to a longer period with treatment and support (Hansen, Lambert, & Forman, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%