1994
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1753201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Public Interest and the Unconstitutionality of Private Prosecutors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, the state monopoly over the criminal proceedings began based on two arguments. Firstly, it was believed that the excessive private vengeance resulted in extreme social unrest (Bessler, 1994), and secondly, the forgiving propensity of few victims endangered the entire society (O'Hara, 2004), and hence, the state control over the system was considered the remedy. However, O'Hara has partly outlined the grounds on which the displacement of victims got rationalized.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the state monopoly over the criminal proceedings began based on two arguments. Firstly, it was believed that the excessive private vengeance resulted in extreme social unrest (Bessler, 1994), and secondly, the forgiving propensity of few victims endangered the entire society (O'Hara, 2004), and hence, the state control over the system was considered the remedy. However, O'Hara has partly outlined the grounds on which the displacement of victims got rationalized.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…105 Before the professionalization of public prosecution systems, private prosecutions, whereby the victim of crime or a murder victim's husband, wife, or next of kin would prosecute the offender, were also routine. 106 A victim or the victim's spouse or next of kin had the right to bring an action known as an appeal against a criminal for murder or another felony, and the motive was often revenge. As one academic, David Siepp, writes of the early common law approach: "Lawyers named vengeance as the motive for bringing appeals of felony.…”
Section: The Ancien Régime Versus the Enlightenmentmentioning
confidence: 99%