The Public Sphere, Social Networks and Public Service Media

Abstract

This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. leftish think-tank) explained that in the late eighteenth century a new political class, the bourgeoisie, came to the fore in Britain in particular and formed a public body which, in sharp contrast to the old authorities, notably the state and the church, provided the conditions for reason-based, public opinion. The creation of a network of institutions by the bourgeoisie within the civil society, and the launch of a number of newspapers more specifically, provided the means through which private thoughts could become public. Permanent repository linkLibraries and universities became the places for public debate, while publishing enterprises formed the means by which government was criticized. That new public sphere was in principle open to all and protected from the power of both the church and the state.

The Analysis of Twitter Use in the Process of 2014 Presidential Election in Turkey in Terms of Deliberative Democracy and Agonistic Democracy Approaches

“…Bu çalışmada, üzerinde durulan tartışma konularından ilki, Twitter'ın katılımda eşitliğe etkisi konusudur. Yeni medyada bilgi kaynaklarının arttığı, iletişim sürecinin yatay ağlara dayanması nedeniyle çoğulculuğun geliştiği, maliyetlerin azaldığı ve kullanım kolaylığı sayesinde farklı ekonomik, kültürel veya siyasal aktörlerin kendilerini ifade edebildiği vurgulanmıştır (Woo-Young, 2005;Losifidis, 2011;Halpern & Gibbs, 2013;Gimmler, 2001;Murru, 2009). Bu bağlamda, yeni medya araçlarının, cinsiyet farklılıklarına bağlı olarak gelişen eşitsizlikleri çözebileceği üzerinde durulmuştur.…”

“…Yeni medyanın akılcı tartışmalara dayanan müzakere olanakları sağladığı vurgulanmaktadır (Losifidis, 2011). Yeni medyada savlara, gerekçelere ve karşılıklı saygıya dayanan müzakerelerin geliştirilebileceği düşünülmektedir (Wright & Street, 2007, s.863;Jensen 2003a;2003b;Price & Caplella, 2003;Albrecth, 2006).…”

Changing civil society in Spain through transparency and civic technologies

“…Nowadays, governments are still reluctant to put broad public participation mechanisms in place. Nevertheless, Internet and new digital languages have provided the peripheral public sphere with action tools and with a methodological base to participate and try to have an impact on the power centres (Iosifidis, 2011).…”

Encuesta y análisis sobre satisfacción, uso y consumo de televisiones públicas en España. La brecha generacional

“…Ha sido tradicional en el estudio de las Televisiones Públicas el interés por los aspectos de gobernanza, gestión de recursos y calidad de los contenidos, desde una perspectiva de servicio público. Este trabajo, se apoya en la literatura existente sobre estas cuestiones, como es el caso de Humphreys (2016), Bustamante (2016), Hortz (2016), Fernández Alonso y Fernández Viso (2012) y Iosifidis (2011), quienes apelan al papel esencial que juega la independencia del poder político para que las televisiones públicas cumplan su misión de servicio público; de Rotermund (2018) y Schweizer y Puppis (2018) sobre el reto de la sociedad conectada para la televisión pública; de Muñoz Saldaña (2015), López Cepeda (2012) y Sarabia Andújar y Sánchez (2012) sobre su financiación; de Campos Freire (2013), Azurmendi, Llorens, López Vidal y Bas Portero (2015), Marzal Felici y Zallo Elguezabal (2016) y Casado del Río, Guimerà i Orts y Miguel de Bustos (2016) sobre las televisiones públicas autonómicas, entre otros.…”