2013
DOI: 10.2174/1874350101306010069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pupil-Teacher Relationship and Gender Differences in Primary School

Abstract: Abstract:In the perspective of multiple attachment bonds, the teacher-child relationship is considered as one of the fundamental ways to express a crucially relevant bond for the child's emotive and cognitive development. The contextualist approach underlines how the dynamics of interaction between the individual and micro-sociocultural contexts play a mediating role on developmental processes. Studies by Pianta, in particular, ascribed to the teacher-pupil interaction a crucial developmental function in the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Barker (2009) found, male adolescents are more likely to use SNS-based communication for social compensation and social identity. Our findings might mirror Barker's notion of social compensation to the context of student-teacher relationship, as it is known that male students have more conflictual relationships with teachers than female students do, and that female teachers have closer relationships with female students than with male students (e.g., Quaglia, Gastaldi, Prino, Pasta, & Longobardi, 2013;Split, Koomen, & Jak, 2012). Therefore, male students might find themselves inferior to their female peers regarding the relationships with their teachers (who are mostly female), hence the possible need for online compensation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As Barker (2009) found, male adolescents are more likely to use SNS-based communication for social compensation and social identity. Our findings might mirror Barker's notion of social compensation to the context of student-teacher relationship, as it is known that male students have more conflictual relationships with teachers than female students do, and that female teachers have closer relationships with female students than with male students (e.g., Quaglia, Gastaldi, Prino, Pasta, & Longobardi, 2013;Split, Koomen, & Jak, 2012). Therefore, male students might find themselves inferior to their female peers regarding the relationships with their teachers (who are mostly female), hence the possible need for online compensation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Studies investigating the role of STRs in promoting students' well-being and academic achievement in the perspective of attachment theory, have shown that teachers which act as a “secure base”—that is, being available, responsive and accepting of students' needs—improve their students' commitment (Hughes et al, 2008; Myers and Pianta, 2008; Gastaldi et al, 2015), competence (Baker, 2006), and favor the development of their learning interests (Hughes et al, 2008; Quaglia et al, 2013). Low-conflict relationships with teachers favor an increase in positive classroom climate and students' perceived teacher support, and a decrease in students' negative experiences (Hamre et al, 2008; O'Connor, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some teachers have been found to hold gender-stereotyped expectations of boys and girls (e.g., Legewie & DiPrete, 2012;Sadker & Zittleman, 2009), to assess identical work differently depending on whether the work was said to be that of a boy or of a girl (Cornwell, Mustard, & Van Parys, 2013;Dee, 2007), and to interact differently with boys and girls in the classroom (e.g., Duffy, Warren, & Walsh, 2001;Jones, & Wheatley,1990;Leder, 1987;Quaglia et al, 2013;Spilt, Koonen,, & Jak, 2012).…”
Section: Teachers and Student Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%