2017
DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1351385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The purpose of education: pedagogues’ and teachers’ negotiations in Danish primary schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is potentially where tutors can come into their own, providing care and guidance to students. While there are difficulties navigating professional boundaries when teachers work with social pedagogues within a school context (Thingstrup et al, 2018), tutors have the potential to relieve teachers of their growing workload pressures by taking a lead role in providing students with holistic support to keep them engaged in learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is potentially where tutors can come into their own, providing care and guidance to students. While there are difficulties navigating professional boundaries when teachers work with social pedagogues within a school context (Thingstrup et al, 2018), tutors have the potential to relieve teachers of their growing workload pressures by taking a lead role in providing students with holistic support to keep them engaged in learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…134-5). With calls for social pedagogues to work in cooperation with conventional teachers (Hygum, 2014; see also Thingstrup, Schmidt and Andersen, 2018), the expertise that pedagogues bring is their insight from the students' life-worlds. Given a chance to coalesce with the more standard teaching approaches in schools, a phenomenological pedagogy could potentially bring vitality to education enterprise at large.…”
Section: Re/turning To a Phenomenological Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objectives are vague in some cases and the role of the social pedagogue is thus tacitly understood or even contradictory. Confusion or complications may arise related to the roles, missions and functions of social pedagogues in relation to teachers and other school staff because they belong partly to another professional culture and are often ascribed a lower position in the school hierarchy based on ignorance of or skepticism about their skills (Borg et al, 2014;Giesecke, 1998;Heimgartner and Sting, 2013;Hvid Thingstrup et al, 2017;Kornbeck and Radermaecker, 2011;Zemancíková, 2010). The recognition and status of Russian social pedagogues in relation to teachers is usually described as low and their tasks are defined to a great extent by head teachers (principals), which contributes to a lack of clarity about their role and to limiting their scope of action (Romm, 2016).…”
Section: The Varying Roles and Functions Of Social Pedagogues In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%