1945
DOI: 10.1002/cne.900820305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pyramidal tract. An enumeration of the large motor cells of area 4 and the axons in the pyramids of the chimpanzee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1956
1956
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to the total number of Betz cells per hemisphere, the values reported by Campbell (1905), Lassek (1940), and Lassek and Wheatley (1945) represent underestimates by a factor of 3.6 in comparison to our results. These considerable discrepancies can be explained by the differences in the techniques used.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Betz Cells Vs Layer V Pyramidal Cellscontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to the total number of Betz cells per hemisphere, the values reported by Campbell (1905), Lassek (1940), and Lassek and Wheatley (1945) represent underestimates by a factor of 3.6 in comparison to our results. These considerable discrepancies can be explained by the differences in the techniques used.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Betz Cells Vs Layer V Pyramidal Cellscontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…This size reduction appears to be related to motor somatotopy: the largest cells are found in the region of foot and leg representation, where efferent axons project the farthest along the corticospinal tract. The values reported in early studies for the total number of Betz cells in one human hemisphere range from 25,000 (Campbell, 1905), to 34,370 (Lassek, 1940;Lassek and Wheatley, 1945;Blinkov and Glezer, 1968), and up to 40,000 (Scheibel and Scheibel, 1978). Lassek (1940) demonstrated that the numerical distribution of Betz cells is related to somatotopy, with 75% of all Betz cells being in the leg area, 17.9% in the arm region, and 6.6% in the head area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible reason for this difference between areas F2d and F2v may be a differential distribution of ‘slow’ and ‘fast’ pyramidal tract neurons (PTNs, Brookhart 1952). According to Verhaart (1948) 10% of pyramidal tract fibres have axonal diameters of up to 3 μm (‘fast’ PTNs), but giant pyramidal cells may account for only 3% of the descending projection (Lassek & Wheatley 1945). Therefore, at least 7% of ‘fast’ PTNs should originate from big pyramids that are not classifiable as giant pyramidal cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%