Fundamentals of Thermochemical Biomass Conversion 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-4932-4_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pyrolysis under Vacuum of Aspen Poplar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, the residence time of volatile products in the wood particles during pyrolysis would be shorter than the time needed for the secondary reactions. In agreement with literature data [48] for vacuum pyrolysis, a significant influence of the particle size can be expected.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Experimental Reaction Kinetics Results Witsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In that case, the residence time of volatile products in the wood particles during pyrolysis would be shorter than the time needed for the secondary reactions. In agreement with literature data [48] for vacuum pyrolysis, a significant influence of the particle size can be expected.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Experimental Reaction Kinetics Results Witsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similar chemistry is accomplished by others in fluidized-bed reactors, (17) cyclonic ablative reactors (18) and vacuum pyrolysis systems. (19)…”
Section: Biomass Liquefaction Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes pyrolysis temperature [Chen and Shi, 2010;Williams and Ahmad, 1999;Yue et al, 2014], heating rate [Değirmenci and Durusoy, 2005;Nazzal, 2002;Williams et al, 1999;Yue et al, 2014], residence time for pyrolysis reaction [Williams and Chishti, 2001], composition of pyrolysis atmosphere [Netzel and Miknis, 1982;Razvigorova et al, 2008], particle size [Ahmad and Williams, 1998;Jaber et al, 1999;Khalil, 2013], and mineral matrix [Espitalie et al, 1980;Karabakan and Yürüm, 1998]. Vacuum pyrolysis has been shown to enable higher yield and improved quality shale oil in comparison with pyrolysis under atmospheric pressure [Hoekstra et al, 2012;Pakdel et al, 1999;Roy et al, 1985;Siramard et al, 2016]. A reduced pressure facilitates the transport of pyrolysis products by providing quicker escape of primary oil from the reaction zone, thus reducing the secondary cracking reactions [Pakdel et al, 1999;Siramard et al, 2016].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%