The quality of care for adults with epilepsy: an initial glimpse using the QUIET measure

Abstract

BackgroundWe examined the quality of adult epilepsy care using the Quality Indicators in Epilepsy Treatment (QUIET) measure, and variations in quality based on the source of epilepsy care.MethodsWe identified 311 individuals with epilepsy diagnosis between 2004 and 2007 in a tertiary medical center in New England. We abstracted medical charts to identify the extent to which participants received quality indicator (QI) concordant care for individual QI's and the proportion of recommended care processes completed for different aspects of epilepsy care over a two year period. Finally, we compared the proportion of recommended care processes completed for those receiving care only in primary care, neurology clinics, or care shared between primary care and neurology providers.ResultsThe mean proportion of concordant care by indicator was 55.6 (standard deviation = 31.5). Of the 1985 possible care processes, 877 (44.2%) were performed; care specific to women had the lowest concordance (37% vs. 42% [first seizure evaluation], 44% [initial epilepsy treatment], 45% [chronic care]). Individuals receiving shared care had more aspects of QI concordant care performed than did those receiving neurology care for initial treatment (53% vs. 43%; X2 = 9.0; p = 0.01) and chronic epilepsy care (55% vs. 42%; X2 = 30.2; p < 0.001).ConclusionsSimilar to most other chronic diseases, less than half of recommended care processes were performed. Further investigation is needed to understand whether a shared-care model enhances quality of care, and if so, how it leads to improvements in quality.

Epilepsy: A Spectrum Disorder

“…Twenty to fifty percent of all patients with epilepsy report cognitive problems that can significantly impair daily activities and quality of life (Halgren et al 1991;Vermeulen et al 1993;Perrine and Kiolbasa 1999;Helmstaedter et al 2004;Pugh et al 2011;Kleen et al 2012Kleen et al , 2013. The neurophysiology of seizures and interictal abnormalities, presence of underlying structural abnormalities, such as hippocampal sclerosis, and side effects of antiepileptic medications, can all contribute to cognitive impairment.…”

Key strategies to improve systems for managing patient complaints within health facilities – what can we learn from the existing literature?

“…Another systematic review showed that in most parts of the world, complaint rates are low when compared to preventable adverse events; that certain groups use available complaint procedures more than others; and that people are more likely to complain informally than formally [34]. A review of 5,375 patient records from 14 hospitals in the Netherlands compared preventable adverse events with informal and formal patient complaints, medico-legal claims by patients and incident reports by staff [35]. The authors found that only 3.6% of the adverse events identified through review of records was found in these reporting systems.…”

A cross-sectional study to assess the patient safety culture in the Palestinian hospitals: a baseline assessment for quality improvement

“…The body of literature shows that safety culture differs across hospital organisations and depends on organisation experience, size and function. 11,12 …”