The Quality of Medical Advice in Low-Income Countries

Abstract

This paper documents the quality of medical advice in low-income countries. Our evidence on health care quality in low-income countries is drawn primarily from studies in four countries: Tanzania, India, Indonesia, and Paraguay. We provide an overview of recent work that uses two broad approaches: medical vignettes (in which medical providers are presented with hypothetical cases and their responses are compared to a checklist of essential procedures) and direct observation of the doctor-patient interaction These two approaches have proved quite informative. For example, doctors in Tanzania complete less than a quarter of the essential checklist for patients with classic symptoms of malaria, a disease that kills 63,000-96,000 Tanzanians each year. A public-sector doctor in India asks one (and only one) question in the average interaction: "What's wrong with you?" We present systematic evidence in this paper to show that these isolated facts represent common patterns. We find that the quality of care in low-income countries as measured by what doctors know is very low, and that the problem of low competence is compounded due to low effort -- doctors provide lower standards of care for their patients than they know how to provide. We discuss how the properties and correlates of measures based on vignettes and observation may be used to evaluate policy changes. Finally, we outline the agenda in terms of further research and measurement.

Why are inaccurate tuberculosis serological tests widely used in the Indian private healthcare sector? A root-cause analysis

“…The published evidence combined with the insights of the following research was used to formulate the survey and conclusions [10][11][12][13][14]16,17,[20][21][22][23]. Face-to-face or telephone interviews were conducted with 41 stakeholders in India: private doctors and private hospital laboratory staff (N = 11), private stand-alone laboratories (N = 7), distributors of diagnostic tests (N = 7), manufacturers of diagnostic tests (N = 7), government hospital doctors (N = 4), and NGOs working in TB (N = 5).…”

“…The doctor is the sole decision maker in determining the tests that a patient will receive. While not all private doctors accept kickbacks and order unnecessary tests, the private healthcare system is influenced by monetary gains, with wide variations in practice quality [20][21][22][23]. Thus, any potential solution must address this reality, and take into account well-documented issues such as referral fees [27,33], unnecessary interventions [34], and widespread antibiotic abuse [20,35,36].…”

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices in safe motherhood care among obstetric providers in Bugesera, Rwanda

“…Medical and surgical interventions in obstetrics are effective life-saving actions when practiced. Although investments in structural capacity building and access to care are improving [18], the capacity and knowledge of providers also need similar investment to improve the quality of service and affect health outcomes [19]. More support for programs focusing on EmOC training for the existing health workforce is needed because it is young and in the early stages of its career.…”

Overworked? On the relationship between workload and health worker performance

“…Following the approach outlined in Das et al (2008), our dependent variable is the quality of health services, here defined as the level of effort exerted in the diagnostic process. Effort is measured as the number of relevant history taking questions asked and physical examinations performed.…”