The quality of medical death certification of cause of death in hospitals in rural Bangladesh: impact of introducing the International Form of Medical Certificate of Cause of Death

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate and timely data on cause of death are critically important for guiding health programs and policies. Deaths certified by doctors are implicitly considered to be reliable and accurate, yet the quality of information provided in the international Medical Certificate of Cause of Death (MCCD) usually varies according to the personnel involved in certification, the diagnostic capacity of the hospital, and the category of hospitals. There are no published studies that have analysed how certifying doctors in Bangladesh adhere to international rules when completing the MCCD or have assessed the quality of clinical record keeping.MethodsThe study took place between January 2011 and April 2014 in the Chandpur and Comilla districts of Bangladesh. We introduced the international MCCD to all study hospitals. Trained project physicians assigned an underlying cause of death, assessed the quality of the death certificate, and reported the degree of certainty of the medical records provided for a given cause. We examined the frequency of common errors in completing the MCCD, the leading causes of in-hospital deaths, and the degree of certainty in the cause of death data.ResultsThe study included 4914 death certificates. 72.9% of medical records were of too poor quality to assign a cause of death, with little difference by age, hospital, and cause of death. 95.6% of death certificates did not indicate the time interval between onset and death, 31.6% required a change in sequence, 13.9% required to include a new diagnosis, 50.7% used abbreviations, 41.5% used multiple causes per line, and 33.2% used an ill-defined condition as the underlying cause of death. 99.1% of death certificates had at least one error. The leading cause of death among adults was stroke (15.8%), among children was pneumonia (31.7%), and among neonates was birth asphyxia (52.8%).ConclusionPhysicians in Bangladeshi hospitals had difficulties in completing the MCCD correctly. Physicians routinely made errors in death certification practices and medical record quality was poor. There is an urgent need to improve death certification practices and the quality of hospital data in Bangladesh if these data are to be useful for policy.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2628-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The role and utility of population-based cancer registries in cervical cancer surveillance and control

“…The first is related to the quality of the cause(s) of death information captured in death certificates, and the training of health care professionals to ensure the systematic and accurate recording and coding of causes of death. Thus far, the results obtained by several training initiatives in LMIC to improve the quality of cause of death information in death certificates are encouraging ( Hart et al, 2020 ; Hazard et al, 2017 ; Miki et al, 2018 ; Uddin et al, 2019 ). Teaching the importance and completion of death certificates with accurate causes of death is an area for improvement in medical schools globally, not only in LMIC ( Lakkireddy et al, 2004 ; Menyah and Bohra, 2016 ; Rolfe et al, 2001 ).…”

Cause-specific mortality estimates for Malaysia in 2013: results from a national sample verification study using medical record review and verbal autopsy

“…From another perspective, the study findings also indicate weaknesses in the quality of medical certification of causes for hospital deaths. Several international studies have also indicated the importance of medical record review to improve the quality of cause of hospital deaths in developing countries [28–31]. Hence, death certification and coding for hospital deaths in Malaysia should also be strengthened in order to increase the overall accuracy of national mortality statistics from vital registration.…”

Perceptions of the healthcare providers regarding acceptability and conduct of minimal invasive tissue sampling (MITS) to identify the cause of death in under-five deaths and stillbirths in North India: a qualitative study

“…The current information on the CoD in children is primarily based on verbal autopsy (VA), as many children die at community level or before reaching hospitals or any healthcare provider. Out of those who reach health facilities, the documentation of CoD is not adequate due to inadequate investigation and incomplete information about CoD in death declaration, often missing the coexisting illnesses or factors [8][9][10][11][12]. Complete diagnostic autopsy, although can provide critical information on CoD, its conduct is dismal for non-legal cases due to the sociocultural and religious norms and technical and infrastructural challenges [13][14][15][16][17].…”