2017
DOI: 10.1017/s2045796017000178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quality of mental health literacy measurement tools evaluating the stigma of mental illness: a systematic review

Abstract: We identified 12 tools demonstrating limited evidence or above for (+, ++, +++) all their properties, 69 tools reaching these levels of evidence for some of their properties, and 20 tools that did not meet the minimum level of evidence for all of their properties. We note that further research on stigma tool development is needed to ensure appropriate application.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another recent sample of collegiate athletes, the reliability coefficient was .66 (Hilliard, Redmond, & Watson, 2018a). However, a majority of public stigma measures examine stigma toward mental illness (Wei et al, 2017), so the SSRPH is best suited for measuring stigma toward seeking treatment. In addition to the evidence from Its status as a unique stigma construct was demonstrated through factor analysis by combining its scores with other related stigma scales such as the SSRPH and one that measures stigma toward mental illness.…”
Section: Measurement Of Stigma Attitudes and Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another recent sample of collegiate athletes, the reliability coefficient was .66 (Hilliard, Redmond, & Watson, 2018a). However, a majority of public stigma measures examine stigma toward mental illness (Wei et al, 2017), so the SSRPH is best suited for measuring stigma toward seeking treatment. In addition to the evidence from Its status as a unique stigma construct was demonstrated through factor analysis by combining its scores with other related stigma scales such as the SSRPH and one that measures stigma toward mental illness.…”
Section: Measurement Of Stigma Attitudes and Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has increasingly focused on investigating the validity of stigma measures in order to facilitate and advance research that aims to reduce stigma and promote help‐seeking. Indeed, a recent systematic review highlighted the need for further testing on the validation of stigma measures (Wei, McGrath, Hayden, & Kutcher, 2018). The Peer Mental Health Stigmatization Scale (PMHSS; McKeague, Hennessy, O'Driscoll, & Heary, 2015) is one such measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hundred and one scales were identified in a recent review of stigma measurement tools. However, only eight were validated for child and adolescent samples, and none measured discriminatory behavior (Wei, McGrath, Hayden, & Kutcher, 2017). In a review of school-based interventions with the aim of improving mental health knowledge, stigma and help-seeking behaviors, attitudes towards mental illness were found to be the most commonly measured outcome.…”
Section: Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%