2021
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2020-0378
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quality of physical activity guidelines, but not the specificity of their recommendations, has improved over time: a systematic review and critical appraisal

Abstract: While numerous guidelines for the prescription of physical activity are released each year, the quality and practicability of these guidelines is unknown. We assessed the quality of 95 guidance documents published since 2000 that included recommendations about physical activity for the promotion of general health and prevention of cardiometabolic disease. We used three tools: AGREE II, the National Academy of Medicine’s (NAM) Standards for Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the FITT score (Frequency… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many evidence-based clinical guidelines exist to guide PA prescription, for example suggesting that adults should engage in at least 150min/week of moderate to vigorous PA. However, type, intensity and frequency should be adjusted to the needs and abilities of each individual and their circumstances [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many evidence-based clinical guidelines exist to guide PA prescription, for example suggesting that adults should engage in at least 150min/week of moderate to vigorous PA. However, type, intensity and frequency should be adjusted to the needs and abilities of each individual and their circumstances [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guideline ecosystem has shifted from a consensus‐based approach, to a structured, transparent and evidence‐informed development of recommendations for clinical practice and health policy. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 Major organizations and initiatives, such as the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), the Guidelines International Network (GIN), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the World Health Organization (WHO), among other, have fostered a culture of evidence‐informed methodology in guideline development. 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12
Key summary AGREE II was developed to inform the methodology of clinical practice guidelines.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%