2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that studies failing to report the method used to generate the randomisation sequence or to conceal group assignment tend to overestimate the effect of intervention under investigation [63,64]. When we limited our analyses to studies which reported adequate randomisation and/or allocation concealment, the results were similar:…”
Section: Risk Of Bias In the Included Studiessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It is well known that studies failing to report the method used to generate the randomisation sequence or to conceal group assignment tend to overestimate the effect of intervention under investigation [63,64]. When we limited our analyses to studies which reported adequate randomisation and/or allocation concealment, the results were similar:…”
Section: Risk Of Bias In the Included Studiessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…So as for TCM, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of herbal medicine were not uncommon, at least in China. During 1999-2004, a total of 7,422 RCTs has been identified from 13 randomly selected journals published in Mainland China, and the number is kept increasing (Wang et al, 2007). However, by reviewing these RCTs, outcomes were discouraging, not because of the treatment outcomes themselves, but the poor qualities as assessed by using international standards, i.e.…”
Section: In Vivo Human Trails -Randomized Controlled Trailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Jadad score scare and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist, more than 90% of these studies were poorly designed or reported with poor scientific rigor (Gagnier et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2007;Wolsko et al, 2005;Zhong et al, 2010). Some essential RCT components, such as sample size calculation, randomization sequence, allocation concealment, implementation of the random-allocation sequence, analysis of intention-to-treat (ITT), lacking syndrome differentiation of TCM, and the use of placebo was not justified and was ethically contradictory, were not sufficiently described in the methodologies of the studies (Gagnier et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2007;Zhong et al, 2010). Even limiting to the RCTs published in English, many investigators have failed to provide proper characterization to the study herbs such as identity, purity, quality, strength, and composition in their articles (Wolsko et al, 2005).…”
Section: In Vivo Human Trails -Randomized Controlled Trailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 40 years, at least 17,000 RCTs have been conducted in China investigating the effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) [85,86] with the majority of these trials related to Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) [85]. However, whilst there is a vast and growing corpus of CHM research, its value as an evidence base has been compromised by a lack of methodological rigour and transparency [86].…”
Section: Chinese Herbal Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%