2002
DOI: 10.1006/redy.2002.0165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quantity and Quality of Schooling and U.S. Labor Productivity Growth (1870–2000)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We plan to explore this question in more detail in future work. Rangazas (2002) and Restuccia & Vandenbroucke (2008) present alternative macroeconomic studies of this issue, which abstract from heterogeneity in student ability.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We plan to explore this question in more detail in future work. Rangazas (2002) and Restuccia & Vandenbroucke (2008) present alternative macroeconomic studies of this issue, which abstract from heterogeneity in student ability.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We pool all observations within a given school group and regress the log real wage on a quartic in experience. We assume that the residual wage is governed by a process of the form log(w j,t ) = α j + X j,t β + ζ j,t + ε j,t (19) ζ i,t = ρζ i,t−1 +ε i,t (20) where the error terms ε i,t˜N (0, σ ε ) andε i,t˜N (0, σ ζ ) are independently distributed. log(w j,t )…”
Section: A3 Psid Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 This scenario involves setting both w1930 = 1.2 and γ1930 = 1.2. According to Rangazas (2002), primary and secondary public education expenditures per pupil increased more than fourfold over the period 1880 to 1930, so that this is likely to be a conservative parameterization. If the productivity and schooling effectiveness were 40 percent higher (so that w1930 = 1.4 and γ1930 = 1.4), then ET W H would be 24 percent lower, and the per period earnings would be about three times larger for the cohort born in 1930 compared to the cohort born in 1880.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bils and Klenow (2000) estimate rates of return of 20% or more for currently developing countries with low levels of schooling. Rangazas (2002) uses a calibration approach to estimate the returns to schooling for the U.S. in 1870. His estimates range between 16 and 20%.…”
Section: Returns To Schooling (θ)mentioning
confidence: 99%