1924
DOI: 10.1086/253596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quantity-Theory of Money

Abstract: Yune 1924 NUMBER 3 THE QUANTITY-THEORY OF MONEY I If price is the quantity of the standard money for which a commodity will exchange, there are two terms to the price ratio, and two sets of forces affecting price: (i) those touching the standard, and (2) those touching the demand and supply of goods. Assuming the usual functions of money, it is obvious that price-making is related directly to the standard money; and that the various forms of money which act as media of exchange have no effect on the price-maki… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 See Laughlin (1924) and Mehrling (2002). Bernanke (2006) Currie had worked for Marriner Eccles at the U.S. Treasury during the period in which Eccles was insisting on centralizing power in the Board before he would consider taking the job as chairman.…”
Section: The Beginning Of Fed Officials' Concern With Monetary Aggregmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 See Laughlin (1924) and Mehrling (2002). Bernanke (2006) Currie had worked for Marriner Eccles at the U.S. Treasury during the period in which Eccles was insisting on centralizing power in the Board before he would consider taking the job as chairman.…”
Section: The Beginning Of Fed Officials' Concern With Monetary Aggregmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debatability of whether it is desirable as a measure of the desire for money remains uncertain. If alterations in the proportion of intermediate and capital transactions relative to income have an impact on the demand for money, then the transactions approach seems to be more favourable as it considers these elements, but the income approach does not, and therefore, the evaluation of the transactions and revenue approach is largely subjective (Allais, 1966;Laughlin, 1924).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%