1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-5632(97)00549-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quartz-fiber calorimeters for the NA50 and ALICE experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with impact parameter b < 8 − 8.5 fm, a stronger suppression is observed [ 3]: this anomalous suppression is the candidate as a signal of deconfined matter production at SPS. Recent NA60 data in In-In collisions confirmed the departure from the normal absorption in central collisions, with a pattern very similar to the one observed in Pb-Pb [ 5]. Surprisingly, also the first data from PHENIX (RHIC) show a suppression of the J/ψ meson comparable with what observed at SPS energies [ 6,7], while the common expectation pointed to a much stronger one.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with impact parameter b < 8 − 8.5 fm, a stronger suppression is observed [ 3]: this anomalous suppression is the candidate as a signal of deconfined matter production at SPS. Recent NA60 data in In-In collisions confirmed the departure from the normal absorption in central collisions, with a pattern very similar to the one observed in Pb-Pb [ 5]. Surprisingly, also the first data from PHENIX (RHIC) show a suppression of the J/ψ meson comparable with what observed at SPS energies [ 6,7], while the common expectation pointed to a much stronger one.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However the model fails in describing the In-In results obtained by the NA60 Collab. [ 5]: the suppression predicted by the DPM is much stronger than what is observed, signaling that the effect of the collision term in Eq.3 is too strong: one could try to reduce it by refitting the parameters, but then the agreement with Pb-Pb data would be lost. The same problem occurs at RHIC energies, where the experimental data are largely underestimated by the theoretical curve [ 13].…”
Section: Suppression By Hadronic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Comparison to model calculations indicates that recombination plays a more significant role at LHC [8]. Furthermore, the p T dependence of J/ψ suppression [22,23,24], the flow pattern of J/ψ as a function of p T [25,26], and the high p T J/ψ suppression pattern as a function of centrality [24,27], reported at LHC and RHIC, can be described consistently by model calculations incorporating color screening and recombination features. We note that substantial suppression observed at high p T points to the color screening feature since the recombination and cold nuclear matter effects are negligible there.…”
Section: Quarkonia: Interplay Of Color Screening and Recombinationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Figure 5 shows systematic comparisons of J/ψ suppression patterns at RHIC and LHC. In central collisions, J/ψ is less suppressed in Pb+Pb at 2.76 TeV for 2.5 < |y| < 4 than in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for 1.2 < |y| < 2.2 [21,22]. A similar feature is observed for mid-rapidity comparisons between LHC and RHIC energies.…”
Section: Quarkonia: Interplay Of Color Screening and Recombinationmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Recent investigations have demonstrated the capabilities of the ALICE muon spectrometer to measure this observable in p-p collisions at √ s = 14 TeV, even with a limited statistics. 10 …”
Section: Quarkonium Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%