Geologic Time Scale 2020 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824360-2.00030-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quaternary Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 191 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jiang et al, 2019;Yao et al, 2021), and the relatively homogenous sedimentary properties indicate the absence of significant hiatuses within each depositional sequence. Therefore, we correlated the magnetozones to the geomagnetic polarity timescale (GPTS; Gibbard & Head, 2020), from chrons C1n to C2An (Figure 3). For example, in core D51, the upper and the lower normal magnetozones can be correlated to the Brunhes chron (C1n), and the Olduvia chron (C2n), respectively; the middle normal magnetozone is correlated to the Jaramillo normal subchron (C1r.1n) within the Matuyama chron; and the reversed magnetozones correlate to the successive reversed polarity intervals of the intervening Matuyama chron, respectively.…”
Section: Rock Magnetic and Paleomagnetic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al, 2019;Yao et al, 2021), and the relatively homogenous sedimentary properties indicate the absence of significant hiatuses within each depositional sequence. Therefore, we correlated the magnetozones to the geomagnetic polarity timescale (GPTS; Gibbard & Head, 2020), from chrons C1n to C2An (Figure 3). For example, in core D51, the upper and the lower normal magnetozones can be correlated to the Brunhes chron (C1n), and the Olduvia chron (C2n), respectively; the middle normal magnetozone is correlated to the Jaramillo normal subchron (C1r.1n) within the Matuyama chron; and the reversed magnetozones correlate to the successive reversed polarity intervals of the intervening Matuyama chron, respectively.…”
Section: Rock Magnetic and Paleomagnetic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). An age model for MLM8 in cal years BP was constructed using a combination of radiocarbon dates and a lithological marker for the start of the Holocene, for which a radiocarbon age of 10 000 a BP was adopted (Gibbard et al, 2020). Nine radiocarbon dates were obtained from core MLM8 of which seven were used in the age-depth model for the core (Table 1) (Fig.…”
Section: Lake-sediment Chronologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These phenomena, mediated by ecological interactions, shaped the evolution of the biota. In turn, the fossil record is key for reconstructing these changes, understanding their pace and magnitude, and comparing and correlating them between different areas [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%