The question of dissection in medical training: Not just “if,” but “when”? A student perspective

Abstract

While debate about the use of—and alternatives to—human cadaveric dissection in medical training is robust, little attention has been paid to questions about timing. This study explores the perspectives of medical students and recent graduates with regard to two key questions: when in the degree program do students prefer dissection opportunities and what are the students getting out of participating in dissection? Self‐report survey data from students in preclinical years (n = 105), clinical years (n = 57), and graduates (n = 13) were analyzed. Most (89%) preferred dissection during the preclinical years, with no effect by training year (χ2 = 1.98, p = 0.16), previous anatomy (χ2 = 3.64, p = 0.31), or dissection (χ2 = 3.84, p = 0.26) experience. Three key findings emerged. First, the majority of students prefer to dissect in the preclinical years because they view dissection as important for developing foundation knowledge and delivering an opportunity for consolidation prior to transitioning to primarily clinical studies. In addition, students recognize that it is a time‐consuming activity requiring specialized facilities. Second, three main understandings of the purpose of dissection were reported: depth of learning, learning experience, and real‐world equivalence. Third, these student perspectives of the purpose of dissection are associated with timing preferences for dissection opportunities. The results identify the preclinical phase as the optimal time to strategically integrate dissection into medical training in order to maximize the benefits of this unique learning opportunity for students and minimize its impact upon curricular time.

An Open-Book Approach to Pelvic Dissection for the Male Genitourinary System

“…Cadaver dissections are expensive and time consuming by nature, which can present logistic, and scheduling challenges, particularly in the context of modern medical training [ 10 ]. The standard anterior approach and sagittal hemi-section approach to pelvic dissection are time-tested and efficient means to teach pelvic anatomy.…”

Frontloading gross anatomy: impacts on medical student performance

“…The recent study investigating preferred timing of cadaveric dissection in the curriculum by medical students (enrolled and graduated) reports the preclinical years as above all the most preferred time. [28] The main reasoning behind this preference was students' view of cadaveric dissection as a fundamental exercise to develop anatomical knowledge before transitioning to the clinical curriculum. The fact that the gross anatomy course at the University of California, Davis is fully integrated with surface, radiographic and ultrasound anatomy, taught by clinicians, may help it succeed as a quasi "stand-alone" course near the beginning of the curriculum to provide comprehensive anatomical knowledge foundation.…”

New virtual platform for teaching comparative animal neuroanatomy based on metameric slices of the central nervous system

“…Anatomy is one of the main subjects that compose the basic science cycle in the study of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, being essential in the undergraduate curriculum of these professionals (Guevar, 2020; Meyer et al, 2017; Ross et al, 2020; Totlis et al, 2021; Webb et al, 2022). Anatomy teaching is based on the use of cadavers, with its main research tool throughout history being the dissection (Brenna, 2022; Comer, 2022; Elhadi et al, 2012; Estai & Bunt, 2016; Ghosh, 2015; Loukas et al, 2011; Marom, 2020).…”