Proceedings of the Workshop on the Evolution, Performance, and Interoperability of QUIC 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3284850.3284857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The QUIC Fix for Optimal Video Streaming

Abstract: Within a few years of its introduction, QUIC has gained traction: a significant chunk of traffic is now delivered over QUIC. The networking community is actively engaged in debating the fairness, performance, and applicability of QUIC for various use cases, but these debates are centered around a narrow, common theme: how does the new reliable transport built on top of UDP fare in different scenarios? Evaluation of unreliable delivery in QUIC remains largely unexplored.The option for delivering content unrelia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these protocols offer advantages in terms of latency, the absence of adequate control mechanisms can be dramatic for the high bandwidth transmission of 6DoF content. Palmer et al address this issue for traditional video streaming by jointly optimizing the application and transport layer, using an adapted version of the QUIC protocol to reliably deliver key frames, while retrieving others without guarantees [9]. In this Time Bandwidth 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 3 Client HTTP Transport 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Figure 3.…”
Section: A Application and Transport Layer Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these protocols offer advantages in terms of latency, the absence of adequate control mechanisms can be dramatic for the high bandwidth transmission of 6DoF content. Palmer et al address this issue for traditional video streaming by jointly optimizing the application and transport layer, using an adapted version of the QUIC protocol to reliably deliver key frames, while retrieving others without guarantees [9]. In this Time Bandwidth 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 3 Client HTTP Transport 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Figure 3.…”
Section: A Application and Transport Layer Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because these studies do not consider network conditions such as the throughput, loss ratio and the number of concurrent connections, aggressive downloads can lead to excessive competition and performance degradation. In Reference [23,24], QUIC was extended to support partial reliable transmission for the performance enhancement of multimedia applications. In partial reliable transmission, essential data were transmitted reliably and, less important data were transmitted unreliably to avoid retransmission.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, latency reduction in the QUIC protocol is limited because it also sets a small initial congestion window and employs slow start. Several studies have been conducted focusing on performance improvement, implementation validation and security [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Among these studies, some authors have proposed latency reduction schemes for QUIC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the video conferencing will experience a loss of fidelity if the delay caused by buffering exceeds 200 ms. For instance, Twitch is a live streaming platform that may also incorporate the playing of video games and a video on demand (VoD) system that allows automatic recording of live broadcasts to be watched later. 2426…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%