2015
DOI: 10.1080/0361526x.2015.1016858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quick and the Dirty: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Database Overlap at the Journal Title Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Issues created by poor data quality may include missing ISSN data, incongruence between print ISSNs and electronic ISSNs, as well as duplicate records within a single title list. Previous studies have also suggested that this approach only allows for overlap analysis to be conducted via paired comparisons rather than multilevel analyses (Harker and Kizhakkethil 2015).…”
Section: Previous Aandi Overlap Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues created by poor data quality may include missing ISSN data, incongruence between print ISSNs and electronic ISSNs, as well as duplicate records within a single title list. Previous studies have also suggested that this approach only allows for overlap analysis to be conducted via paired comparisons rather than multilevel analyses (Harker and Kizhakkethil 2015).…”
Section: Previous Aandi Overlap Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of this type of collection analysis in the literature include the utilizing usage statistics to gauge the strength of the collection, 37 to provide comparison data with other libraries, 38 and to provide data for discussions with faculty about the types of assignments used in and thus resources needed for their courses. 39 Additional examples include database overlap comparisons, 40 analyzing reference chat transcripts to improve management of electronic resources, 41 and combining usage statistics with citation studies to evaluate a large journal package. 42 While these are just a smattering of examples, they represent attempts to match collections to curriculum and faculty research needs, and to provide librarians a more systematic way of crafting the best collection for the library's constituents.…”
Section: Involvement In Collection Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Librarians at University of North Texas explored several freely available and paid tools which could act as faster alternatives to Excel. However, inconsistencies in the results showed that multiple tools were necessary to get a true picture (Harker & Kizhakkethil, 2015). Add-ons to Excel such as AbleBits allowed tables to be merged easily.…”
Section: Developing a Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%