2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9008-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Radiology Digital Dashboard: Effects on Report Turnaround Time

Abstract: As radiology departments transition to near-complete digital information management, work flows and their supporting informatics infrastructure are becoming increasingly complex. Digital dashboards can integrate separate computerized information systems and summarize key work flow metrics in real time to facilitate informed decision making. A PACS-integrated digital dashboard function designed to alert radiologists to their unsigned report queue status, coupled with an actionable link to the report signing app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies used an interrupted time series design to monitor the effect of introducing the dashboard on outcomes over time [32,33]. Other study designs included before-after studies [34][35][36], non-comparative evaluations [37,38], questionnaire surveys of users of dashboards [2,39] and a usability study [40]. With two exceptions [28,37], the dashboards were evaluated in one organization, where they had been developed and implemented.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Two studies used an interrupted time series design to monitor the effect of introducing the dashboard on outcomes over time [32,33]. Other study designs included before-after studies [34][35][36], non-comparative evaluations [37,38], questionnaire surveys of users of dashboards [2,39] and a usability study [40]. With two exceptions [28,37], the dashboards were evaluated in one organization, where they had been developed and implemented.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall one study was rated as being of high quality [33], four as being fair-good quality [28,32,35,40] and five as low quality [2,34,[37][38][39]. The kappa coefficient between the two raters was 0.92 (95% CI 0.82-1.00) indicating very good agreement.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations