1975
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1975-0374381-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Radon-Nikodym property in conjugate Banach spaces

Abstract: We characterize conjugate Banach spaces X* having the Radon-Nikodym Property as those spaces such that any separable subspace of X has a separable conjugate. Several applications are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let F be any separable infinite-dimensional subspace. of E. By a result of Stegall (9), F* is separable. Also, F* is a quotient of E*; hence the proposition applies to E*.…”
Section: Corollary Let E Be An Infinite-dimensional Banach Space Sucmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Let F be any separable infinite-dimensional subspace. of E. By a result of Stegall (9), F* is separable. Also, F* is a quotient of E*; hence the proposition applies to E*.…”
Section: Corollary Let E Be An Infinite-dimensional Banach Space Sucmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…a non-empty intersection with a half-space) of arbitrarily small diameter. There are many other equivalent formulations: the reader may refer to [52] or [15] for further enlightenment. Amongst other things, Asplund spaces coincide with spaces whose duals have RNP.…”
Section: Asplund Spaces and The Duality Counterexamplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This appears implicitly in [52,Corollary 6] (ii) Clearly Y + S 0 /Y is separable, so (i) allows us to choose some separable subspace S of X such that Y + S = Y + S 0 . One may assume that S contains S 0 , replacing S by S + S 0 if necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that Z is separable, and we may assume that f n ∈ L 1 (µ, Z). Since X * has the RadonNikodým property and Z is a separable subspace of X, we have that Z * is also separable [13]. Since it is obvious that Z * is a norming subspace for Z, we can apply Lemma 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%