1989
DOI: 10.1109/36.29563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The RADTRAN microwave surface emission models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior results because, once the optical depth of the canopy becomes large enough to obscure emission from the surface (which occurs near 10 GHz for a thick canopy), any further increase in frequency tends to increase the scattering by the canopy, which will lower the effective emissivity of the surface plus canopy. Above 10 GHz, the emissivity modeled by Isaacs et al (1989) was also unpolarized and had little angular dependence. A more recent model for the emissivity of a leafy deciduous forest also showed saturation effects at 10 GHz for high biomass content (Ferrazzoli and Guerriero 1996).…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This behavior results because, once the optical depth of the canopy becomes large enough to obscure emission from the surface (which occurs near 10 GHz for a thick canopy), any further increase in frequency tends to increase the scattering by the canopy, which will lower the effective emissivity of the surface plus canopy. Above 10 GHz, the emissivity modeled by Isaacs et al (1989) was also unpolarized and had little angular dependence. A more recent model for the emissivity of a leafy deciduous forest also showed saturation effects at 10 GHz for high biomass content (Ferrazzoli and Guerriero 1996).…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The use of this simplified parametric model for the canopy emission over 18-40 GHz is justified by both models and observations. Isaacs et al (1989) developed a model for the emissivity of a heavily vegetated scene based on radiative transfer through a continuous random media and determined that, for optically thick (i.e., water laden) vegetation, the emissivity increased with frequency at frequencies less 10 GHz and then monotonically decreased with frequency at frequencies greater than 10 GHz. This behavior results because, once the optical depth of the canopy becomes large enough to obscure emission from the surface (which occurs near 10 GHz for a thick canopy), any further increase in frequency tends to increase the scattering by the canopy, which will lower the effective emissivity of the surface plus canopy.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the satellite observation studies, microwave radiative transfer modeling results depend on reliable estimates of the microwave surface emittance for various geographical regions and vegetation biome types [Isaacs et al, 1989]. Improvement of such land microwave surface emittance databases and models by incorporating more realistic distributions of microwave surface emittance would enhance current microwave remote sensing efforts over land.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, sea ice emissivity, defined as the ratio of the radiant flux from the material to that of a blackbody at the same physical temperature (Comiso 1983), can give insight into the following factors; ice types, composition, edge, age, thickness, surface characteristics, incidence angle, snow cover, frequency, polarization, ocean currents, weather, and etc. (e.g., Weeks 1981;Kidder and Vonder Haar 1995;Isaacs et al 1989;Grenfell 1992). In addition, information about the emissivity is prerequisite to deduce atmospheric properties from microwave measurements (Haggerty and Curry 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past three decades, sea ice concentration and extent data have been obtained from several satellite-borne microwave radiometers using multichannels of 10, 19, 24, 37, 50.3, 85, 89, 140, 150, 157, and 220 GHz (e.g., Zwally et al 1983;Comiso 1983;Susskind et al 1984;Hollinger et al 1984;Grenfell and Lohanick 1985;Isaacs et al 1989;Hewison and English 1999;Miao et al 2001). These instruments include the Electronically Scanning Microwave Radiometer (ESMR), the Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR), the Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I), and the Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%