2016
DOI: 10.1163/24055069-00104001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ramellian Bookwheel

Abstract: Agostino Ramelli’s theatre of machines of 1588 includes a design for a bookwheel, a machine rotating on a horizontal axle which would hold a number of large books open simultaneously in such a way that a reader could bring each into view in turn. Since the 1990s, the Ramellian bookwheel has become an icon of early modern techniques of reading. This paper gives an account of Ramelli’s design and its fortuna; surveys the history of rotating reading machines before Ramelli (all of which pivoted on vertical axles)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ramellian book wheel -allowing several books to be consulted at once -has become an icon of early modern reading, and while few owned such an item, many read multiple books at the same time. 31 Marginal notes illustrate the results of those encounters, highlighting how even solitary reading engages in larger conversations. Anthony Grafton and William Sherman, for example, have shown how two renowned Hellenists -Thomas Smith and Isaac Casaubonread their copies of Flavius Josephus very differently, drawing on different works to critique and interpret the text.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ramellian book wheel -allowing several books to be consulted at once -has become an icon of early modern reading, and while few owned such an item, many read multiple books at the same time. 31 Marginal notes illustrate the results of those encounters, highlighting how even solitary reading engages in larger conversations. Anthony Grafton and William Sherman, for example, have shown how two renowned Hellenists -Thomas Smith and Isaac Casaubonread their copies of Flavius Josephus very differently, drawing on different works to critique and interpret the text.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%