2019
DOI: 10.1108/pijpsm-04-2018-0054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rapid diffusion of license plate readers in US law enforcement agencies

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to document the diffusion of license plate readers (LPRs) in the USA, examining the variety, evolution and tracking of their uses through a national survey. Design/methodology/approach This study employs a national, stratified, representative survey of US law enforcement agencies with 100 or more officers. Findings LPR technology is currently used by at least two-thirds of larger police agencies, which represents a more than threefold increase in LPR acquisition in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this technology raises numerous ethical questions and civil liberty concerns, the use of ALPRs is increasingly widespread. In 2013, 63% of law enforcement agencies with at least 100 sworn officers reported using ALPRS, and the number was expected to increase, spurred by federal and state funding (Lum et al, 2016). Although limiting officer discretion could reduce the reliance on stereotypes when deciding who to stop, the use of ALPRs is not likely to entirely replace officer decision-making, allowing bias to play a role.…”
Section: Evidence-based Policy Response To Racial Bias In Policingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this technology raises numerous ethical questions and civil liberty concerns, the use of ALPRs is increasingly widespread. In 2013, 63% of law enforcement agencies with at least 100 sworn officers reported using ALPRS, and the number was expected to increase, spurred by federal and state funding (Lum et al, 2016). Although limiting officer discretion could reduce the reliance on stereotypes when deciding who to stop, the use of ALPRs is not likely to entirely replace officer decision-making, allowing bias to play a role.…”
Section: Evidence-based Policy Response To Racial Bias In Policingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the coverage rate of loop detectors in the United States may be higher than that of LPR, in China and other Asian countries (e.g., Singapore), LPR is becoming more and more popular and has a higher penetration rate due to its use in law enforcement (Mo et al., ). There is also much evidence of increasing LPR deployment in the United States (Lum et al., ). Therefore, we expect that LPR data can replace previous data sources in the future.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58-83;Ohio State Highway Patrol, 2005;Ozer, 2010;PA Consulting Group, n.d., 2004;Potts, 2018;Taylor, Koper, & Woods, 2011, 2012. In contrast, there is scant evidence on whether LPR use actually improves investigative clearances or reduces crime (Lum et al, 2018;Lum & Koper, 2017, pp. 120-124).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The CMPD study is also notable in that it highlights fixed LPR deployment. Although police most commonly mount LPRs on moving patrol cars, they deploy about one-quarter of their units at fixed locations (Lum et al, 2018). The relative advantages and disadvantages of fixed versus mobile deployment have received little attention, as studies of LPRs to date have largely focused on patrol use (for an exception, see Ohio State Highway Patrol, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation