2008
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.081927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rate and Spectrum of Microsatellite Mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans and Daphnia pulex

Abstract: The effective use of microsatellite loci as tools for microevolutionary analysis requires knowledge of the factors influencing the rate and pattern of mutation, much of which is derived from indirect inference from population samples. Interspecific variation in microsatellite stability also provides a glimpse into aspects of phylogenetic constancy of mutational processes. Using long-term series of mutation-accumulation lines, we have obtained direct estimates of the spectrum of microsatellite mutations in two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
4
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the different factors, the motif repeat number of the microsatellite was found to be significantly correlated to the number of new alleles in G 15 . This result is consistent with mutation studies that suggest that longer microsatellites are more unstable (Wierdl et al 1997) and have higher mutation rates (Rubinsztein et al 1995;Schug et al 1998;Seyfert et al 2008). In this study, we found no evidence that the motif of the microsatellite locus, its degree of perfection, its chromosomal location, or its genome (A, B, D) position had an effect on the microsatellite diversity, but we had little power to detect weak effects.…”
Section: Mutation Rate Estimatorssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the different factors, the motif repeat number of the microsatellite was found to be significantly correlated to the number of new alleles in G 15 . This result is consistent with mutation studies that suggest that longer microsatellites are more unstable (Wierdl et al 1997) and have higher mutation rates (Rubinsztein et al 1995;Schug et al 1998;Seyfert et al 2008). In this study, we found no evidence that the motif of the microsatellite locus, its degree of perfection, its chromosomal location, or its genome (A, B, D) position had an effect on the microsatellite diversity, but we had little power to detect weak effects.…”
Section: Mutation Rate Estimatorssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As far as we know, four kinds of approaches have been used to estimate mutation rates in a wide range of species. They can be described according to the timescale they consider: a short timescale when using (i) pedigree-based (or parent-offspring) estimation [in humans (Weber and Wong 1993;Heyer et al 1997;Whittaker et al 2003), in birds (Brohede et al 2002(Brohede et al , 2004Beck et al 2003), 1 and in Gastropoda (Gow et al 2005)] or (ii) mutationaccumulation lines [in maize (Vigouroux et al 2002), in wheat (Thuillet et al 2002), in Drosophila Vazquez et al 2000), in Caenorhabditis elegans (Denver et al 2004;Seyfert et al 2008), and in Dictyostelium discoideum (McConnell et al 2007)], and a long timescale with (iii) interspecies comparison scaling divergence time with fossil data [human/chimp (Webster et al 2002;Sainudiin et al 2004;Kayser et al 2006)] or (iv) within-species allele-frequency distribution [in wheat (Chakraborty et al 1997;Thuilletet al 2004), in humans (Xu et al 2005), and in Arabidopsis thaliana (Symonds and Lloyd 2003)]. Short timescale approaches (pedigree or accumulation lines) are expected to be less biased since they rely on the direct observation of neo-mutations but to reach a sufficient accuracy they need larger sample sizes to allow for the detection of rather rare events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this expression ignores the possibility of loss of heterozygosity by back mutations, this assumption appears reasonable for moderate timescales given that most microsatellite mutations in Daphnia involve multiple-step changes and that almost all single-step changes involve single-repeat insertions to the exclusion of deletions (Seyfert et al 2008). Results from long-term mutation-accumulation experiments indicate that, for the loci involved in this study, average u ¼ 7.1 (2.6) 3 10…”
Section: Phylogenetic Distribution Of Meiosis Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…/allele/generation (Seyfert et al 2008) and that the average rate of loss of heterozygosity by gene conversion (c) ¼ 1.2 (0.6) 3 10 À4 /allele/generation (Omilian et al 2006).…”
Section: à5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutation rate in Daphnia is not yet known, but, at least for microsatellites, it appears to be similar to that of Caenorhabditis elegans and D. melanogaster (Seyfert et al 2008). We thus used the average genomic mutation rate À6 cM/bp per sexual generation, or r % 7.5 3 10 À7 per generation (sexual and asexual generations combined, assuming one sexual generation per 10 asexual ones).…”
Section: Stratification Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%