2013
DOI: 10.1214/11-aihp455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rate of escape for random walks on polycyclic and metabelian groups

Abstract: We use subgroup distortion to determine the rate of escape of a simple random walk on a class of polycyclic groups, and we show that the rate of escape is invariant under changes of generating set for these groups. For metabelian groups, we define a stronger form of subgroup distortion, which applies to non-finitely generated subgroups. Under this hypothesis, we compute the rate of escape for certain random walks on metabelian groups via a comparison to the toppling of a dissipative abelian sandpile.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(See also Thompson (2010) for more classes with this behavior.) On nonamenable groups, on the other hand, we have…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…(See also Thompson (2010) for more classes with this behavior.) On nonamenable groups, on the other hand, we have…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In [18], Revelle studies groups of the form G ≀ Z, where the random walk on G has α-tight degree of escape, and proves that G ≀ Z has α ′ = 1+α 2 -tight degree of escape; he also shows that n α ′ (log log n) 1−α ′ is an upper scaling function for G ≀ Z, whereas n α ′ / (log log n) 1−α ′ is a lower scaling function for this group. Revelle studies in addition several Baumstag-Soliter groups, proving they have an inner radius of order n/ log log n and an outer radius of order √ n log log n. Finally, in [20] Thompson proves Laws of Iterated Logarithm for certain polycyclic and metaabelian groups. He shows that these groups are all diffusive, have 1 2 -tight degree of escape (which is a form of control over the tail of the distance function), and have an upper scaling function g(n) = √ n log log n.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It suffices to show that there is a constant D ≥ 1 with the following property (cf. [35,Lemma 3.4]). Let s i ∈ G be such that |s i | G ≤ 1 and put g k := s 1 · · · s k ∈ G and M n := max k=1,...,n |g k N | G/N .…”
Section: More On the Property H F Dmentioning
confidence: 99%