Background
In the realm of sports science, nutrition is a well-established pillar for athletes’ training, performance, and post-workout recovery. However, the role of gut microbiota, often overlooked, is a novel and intriguing aspect that can significantly impact athletic performance. With this in mind, our study ventures into uncharted territory, investigating the effect of probiotic and casein supplementation on the aerobic capacity of male soccer players.
Method
A double-blinded and placebo-controlled study was conducted with 44 male soccer players (Age: 22.81 ± 2.76 yr, Height: 177.90 ± 6.75 cm, Weight: 67.42 ± 8.44 kg). The participants were subjected to the Bruce test in the beginning; then, they were randomly divided into four groups, each consisting of 11 people: probiotics (PRO), casein (CAS), probiotics with casein (PRO+CAS), and placebo (PLA). PRO group was given one probiotic capsule (containing strains of
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum
BP06, Lacticaseibacillus casei BP07,
Lactobacillus acidophilus
BA05,
Lactobacillus delbrueckii
BD08
bulgaricus
,
Bifidobacterium infantis
BI04,
Bifidobacterium longum
BL03,
Bifidobacterium breve
BB02 and
Streptococcus salivarius thermophilus
BT01, with a total dose of 4.5 × 10
11
CFU) during dinner, while the CAS group consumed 20 grams of casein powder 45 minutes before bed. The PRO+CAS group was given one probiotic capsule during dinner and 20 grams of casein powder 45 minutes before bed. The participants in the PLA group were given one red capsule (containing 5 grams of starch) during dinner. All participants were instructed to take the supplements only on training days, three times a week for four weeks. The maximal oxygen consumption (VO
2max
), Ventilatory Threshold (VT), Time-to-exhaustion (TTE), Respiratory Compensation Point (RCP), Isocapnic area Time (Time-IC), Isocapnic area oxygen consumption (VO
2
-IC), and Hypocapnic Hyperventilation area Time (Time-HHV), after the Bruce test were Measured. All data were analyzed using SPSS Windows software, mixed repeated measure ANOVA, and Bonferroni post hoc test at
p
< 0.05 level.
Results
The current study’s findings illustrated that, after the intervention, TTE (
p
= 0.01) and RCP (
p
= 0.01) were significantly improved in PRO+CAS compared to the PLA group. No significant difference was observed between PRO and PLA (
p
= 0.52), PRO and CAS (
p
= 0.999), PRO and PRO+CAS (
p
= 0.9), CAS and PLA (
p
= 0.65), CAS and PRO+CAS (
p
...