1974
DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1974.tb01647.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ratio of primary scattering to total scattering of sky radiance

Abstract: Recently Eschelbach has computed from theory spectral radiance values for a turbid atmosphere taking into account the effect of multiple scattering. In the present work these computational data were used to investigate the ratio of primary to total scattering. This quotient is a measure of multiple scattering because of the relation: Total Scattering (TS) is equal to Primary Scattering (PS) plus Multiple Scattering (MS), i.e. PS/TS = 100 ‐ MS/TS (%). It is discussed in which way multiple scattering in the sola… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This seems logical since multiple scattering is ignored in this model. This also indicates that, in the measured values, multiple scattering is responsible for one third of the sky irradiance, which seems consistent with [22] (especially the values from Table 1, for a turbidity T = 2). The RMSE between the Nishita93 model and the measurements, summed over the 17 daytimes, 81 direction samples, and the wavelengths between 360 and 720 nm, is 26.6 mW/(m 2 .sr.nm).…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This seems logical since multiple scattering is ignored in this model. This also indicates that, in the measured values, multiple scattering is responsible for one third of the sky irradiance, which seems consistent with [22] (especially the values from Table 1, for a turbidity T = 2). The RMSE between the Nishita93 model and the measurements, summed over the 17 daytimes, 81 direction samples, and the wavelengths between 360 and 720 nm, is 26.6 mW/(m 2 .sr.nm).…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 87%