1957
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/22.3.329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ratio of Shell to Meat in Mytilus as a Function of Tidal Exposure to Air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mussels from the mid tide maintained a similar shell weight/ shell length ratio to mussels from the low tide. This was an unexpected result as previous studies comparing intertidal and subtidal populations of the same species have found that the shells of intertidal mussels were heavier than subtidal mussels (Baird & Drinnan 1957;Hickman 1979). The mechanisms by which P. canaliculus from the mid tide maintain positive scope for growth most likely result from a combination of energy conservation during aerial exposure (Marsden & Weatherhead 1998) and energy supplementation as a result of higher clearance rates during reduced periods of tidal immersion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mussels from the mid tide maintained a similar shell weight/ shell length ratio to mussels from the low tide. This was an unexpected result as previous studies comparing intertidal and subtidal populations of the same species have found that the shells of intertidal mussels were heavier than subtidal mussels (Baird & Drinnan 1957;Hickman 1979). The mechanisms by which P. canaliculus from the mid tide maintain positive scope for growth most likely result from a combination of energy conservation during aerial exposure (Marsden & Weatherhead 1998) and energy supplementation as a result of higher clearance rates during reduced periods of tidal immersion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…33 &Pilkington 1995). Relatively few studies have compared the CI of bivalves from different tidal levels but for M.edulis from Europe (Baird & Drinnan 1957;Baird 1966;Aldrich & Crowley 1986) and in the New Zealand cockle, Austrovenus stutchburyi, low-shore individuals consistently have higher values than those from mid tide levels (Dobbinson et al 1989). There are no comparative values for any Perna spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reduction in mussel growth rate with decreasing submergence time was also found at many other tidal coasts. The availability of food is controlled by immersion time, which in turn is a direct function of tidal height (Baird and Drinnan, 1957;Baird, 1966;Seed, 1968;Suchanek, 1978;Bertness and Grosholz, 1985). Therefore, the longer time for feeding is considered to be the main reason for faster growth in the subtidal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mussel size and age are also important (Baird, 1966;Seed, 1968;Widdows et al, 1984) and at high mussel densities intraspeci®c competition for food may reduce growth rate in bivalves (Bertness and Grosholz, 1985;Wildish and Kristmanson, 1985;Okamura, 1986;Newell, 1990). On tidal coasts, duration of air exposure is considered to be one of the most important factors for growth in mussels (Baird and Drinnan, 1957;Baird, 1966;Bertness and Grosholz, 1985;Faldborg et al, 1994;McGrorty et al, 1993;McGrorty, 1997) and may lead to considerable variations in size and shape between intertidal and subtidal M. edulis (Baird, 1966;Seed, 1968). Epibionts have also been shown to in¯uence mussel growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On tidal coasts, duration of air exposure of intertidal mussel beds is considered to be one of the most crucial factors controlling mussel growth (e.g. Baird & Drinnan 1957;Faldborg et al 1994;McGrorty 1997) and may lead to considerable variations in size and shape between intertidal and subtidal M. edulis (Baird 1966;Seed 1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%