2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(01)00111-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rationale and Design of the CPCRA (Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS) 058 FIRST (Flexible Initial Retrovirus Suppressive Therapies) Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data for this paper came from the Metabolic Study,15 a substudy of a long-term randomized clinical trial, Flexible Initial Retrovirus Suppressive Therapies (FIRST) 16 conducted by the Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) 17…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for this paper came from the Metabolic Study,15 a substudy of a long-term randomized clinical trial, Flexible Initial Retrovirus Suppressive Therapies (FIRST) 16 conducted by the Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) 17…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis included participants in Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) 058 (Flexible Initial Retrovirus Suppressive Therapies [FIRST]), a multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted at 18 US sites that is managed by the National Institutes of Health-sponsored CPCRA [15]. During the period February 1999 through January 2002, antiretroviral-naive participants were randomized to 1 of 3 initial ART strategy groups: (1) the protease inhibitor (PI) strategy group, who received PI(s) plus nucleoside analogues;…”
Section: Symptoms and Quality Of Life Were Assessed Among Human Immunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 1999 through 2002 participants were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to one of three initial strategies: the protease inhibitor (PI) strategy (PI[s] + nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs]); the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) strategy (an NNRTI + NRTIs); or the 3-class strategy (PI[s] + an NNRTI + NRTI[s]). Clinicians could choose individual medications within the assigned strategy or those medications were randomly assigned for participants enrolled in class-specific substudies (14% of participants) [9]. This analysis was limited to the PI and NNRTI strategies in order to evaluate initial regimens that are similar to those currently recommended.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%