2006
DOI: 10.1002/app.23679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reaction in water of UF resins with isocyanates at short curing times: A 13C NMR investigation

Abstract: CP MAS13 C NMR spectra of hardened resins have shown that urethane bridges derived from the reaction of the isocyanate group with the hydroxymethyl group of urea do form even at fast curing times comparable to what was used in the wood panels industry, in lower proportions than what was shown earlier. Polyureas and biurets obtained from the reaction of isocyanate with water are the predominant crosslinking reactions of pMDI alone and in UF/pMDI resin systems under fast curing conditions. Residual, unreacted is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…mole ratios to prepare adhesives. These adhesives were used to investigate adhesive properties and bond performance in wood application [124] [125] [126]. Reaction of Synthesis of MHSBO and polyurethanes is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Multi-hydroxy Soybean Oil (Mhsbo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mole ratios to prepare adhesives. These adhesives were used to investigate adhesive properties and bond performance in wood application [124] [125] [126]. Reaction of Synthesis of MHSBO and polyurethanes is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Multi-hydroxy Soybean Oil (Mhsbo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows the reactions which appear to occur between the still active isocyanate (-N=C=O) groups of the polyurethane and the groups of the low condensation HMR. Unreacted -N=C=O groups are noticeable in both CP-MAS 13 C-NMR spectra between 123 and 126 ppm [21][22][23]. Both in the HMR/isocyanate reaction in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…5) the most evident features differentiating the two are the appearance of a definite peak at 58.5-59 ppm which is due to the formation of the methylol group as a consequence of the reaction of formaldehyde with the protein [1,[22][23][24]. As the reaction was carried out under alkaline conditions there is no evidence of methylene groups in the 35 to 45 ppm range [23,24], as it would be expected. However, their presence could be masked by the dominant peaks belonging to the protein in this same region of the spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%