|Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5569-5609 Chemical Reviews REVIEW in 1900, 16 their 2-oxohexosyl ("ulosyl") analogues were not encountered until 73 years later, when Collins et al. 17 subjected the 2-O-unprotected hexosyl chlorides of D-glucose and D-galactose to a ruthenium tetroxide oxidation, e.g., 1 f 2 (Scheme 2). The somewhat intricate accessibility of 2 and its galacto analoguefive steps from the underlying sugar in modest overall yields (15À20%)-and their capricious obtention as gums, however, have not invited their utilization as glycosyl donors for the synthesis of oligosaccharides.Only the elaboration of a simple, preparatively satisfactory access to their bromo analogues, the glycosulosyl bromides, from any of the common sugars 14 and the establishment of suitable conditions for β-specific glycosidation and manno-selective reduction 9 prompted their comprehensive use as indirect glycosyl donors for the straightforward synthesis of oligosaccharides containing β-D-mannose units.Key intermediates for the efficient generation of glycos-2-ulosyl bromides are the 2-(acyloxy)glycals. In their ester-protected form, they are most readily accessible from any of the basic monoor disaccharides in a large-scale adaptabe three-step procedure comprising acylation, bromination, and elimination of hydrogen bromide, as exemplified for the D-glucose case in Scheme 3. As the first two of these steps can be combined into a one-pot operation, the overall yields are in the 70% range. 18