2021
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The readability of official public health information on COVID‐19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis progressed through the following four stages:1. Calculation of readability scores (Flesch Reading, Gunning Fog, Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG and readability consensus score) across all documents to gauge the document’s accessibility for audiences with different literacy levels (Ferguson et al, 2021; Mac et al, 2021). 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis progressed through the following four stages:1. Calculation of readability scores (Flesch Reading, Gunning Fog, Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG and readability consensus score) across all documents to gauge the document’s accessibility for audiences with different literacy levels (Ferguson et al, 2021; Mac et al, 2021). 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when information was available, many women found it confusing. This may in part be due to the evolving nature of COVID-19 situations however, two recent studies found that most COVID-19 information provided to the Australian public exceeded recommended reading levels required to ensure widespread understanding [40,41]. This is reflected in findings from the social media analysis which demonstrated a strong need for clearer information, especially with regards to vaccination.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent that COVID-19 public health communication efforts fall short of community needs can be clearly observed even through relatively crude methods. For example, a recent study showed that the median grade reading score for Australian government COVID-19 information on vaccination, mask-wearing, and physical distancing ranged from Grade 12 to university level (Grade 14) for resources collected in April 2021 [9] This is 4–6 grades beyond the recommended Grade 8 reading level for effective communication to the average reader in the community [10] . Similarly, our survey of over 4000 Australians at the start of the pandemic (April 2020) found that even single-item questions that roughly estimate health literacy (skills for accessing, understanding and acting on health information) identified that low health literacy was associated with lower confidence understanding government COVID-19 information, and poorer knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and prevention behaviours [11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%